Kinematics Question: How Long to Fall 36m with Negligible Air Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crimsonn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving the time it takes for an object to fall 36 meters when thrown downward with an initial velocity of 12 m/s, assuming negligible air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations and conservation of energy to solve the problem. There are attempts to plug values into the kinematic equation and concerns about arithmetic errors in solving the quadratic equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting the use of energy conservation while others emphasize sticking to kinematic equations. There is acknowledgment of potential mistakes in calculations, and participants are encouraged to re-evaluate their solutions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the methods suggested, indicating a preference for kinematic approaches over energy conservation. There is also mention of reviewing material from a previous test, which may influence their understanding of the problem.

crimsonn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
assuming negligible air resistance, how long will it take for a sphere to fall 36.0 meters if thrown downward at 12 m/s?



2. kinematics

x= x0 +v0t + (1/2)at^2




3. plugging it in..

36= 12t + 4.9t^2
4.9t^2+12t - 36

doing all the math and what not with the quadratic I get

1.04

the answer is 1.75



this is a pretty simple question...I don't know why I'm having trouble with it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok. You'll want to use conservation of total energy first of all. Try that and you should get 1.75.
You'll find a velocity as it hits the ground, and you know the initial velocity, so you can easily find the average velocity. Knowing the distance traveled and average velocity you know how to find the time
 
that doesn't make much sense to me.

Honestly, I'm just reviewing from my chapter 2 test for physics. It shouldn't take anything more than kinematics.
 
Ok, well then use that equation. you should be getting 1.75.
not sure how you're solving your quadratic...?
 
Your kinematic equation is fine. Redo your solution. (You must have made an arithmetic error.)
 
Your quadratic equation is correct, but your solution is wrong. if you write down your solution explicitly, then I can see where it went wrong.
 
wow. just kidding. sorry.

stupid, stupid mistake. instead of 4ac in the quadratic I used 2ac. I was just so convinced that I was right -.-

thank you everyone.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K