Kinematics Question: How Long to Fall 36m with Negligible Air Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crimsonn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a sphere to fall 36 meters when thrown downward at an initial velocity of 12 m/s, assuming negligible air resistance. The kinematic equation used is x = x0 + v0t + (1/2)at², leading to the quadratic equation 4.9t² + 12t - 36 = 0. The correct solution to this equation is 1.75 seconds, which was confirmed after addressing an arithmetic error in the quadratic formula application. Participants emphasized the importance of using conservation of energy principles alongside kinematics for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically x = x0 + v0t + (1/2)at²
  • Familiarity with solving quadratic equations
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s²)
  • Ability to apply conservation of energy principles in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice solving various kinematic problems involving different initial velocities and heights
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in the context of free-fall motion
  • Explore advanced topics in projectile motion and air resistance effects
  • Review the quadratic formula and its applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and motion analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of problem-solving in physics contexts.

crimsonn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
assuming negligible air resistance, how long will it take for a sphere to fall 36.0 meters if thrown downward at 12 m/s?



2. kinematics

x= x0 +v0t + (1/2)at^2




3. plugging it in..

36= 12t + 4.9t^2
4.9t^2+12t - 36

doing all the math and what not with the quadratic I get

1.04

the answer is 1.75



this is a pretty simple question...I don't know why I'm having trouble with it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok. You'll want to use conservation of total energy first of all. Try that and you should get 1.75.
You'll find a velocity as it hits the ground, and you know the initial velocity, so you can easily find the average velocity. Knowing the distance traveled and average velocity you know how to find the time
 
that doesn't make much sense to me.

Honestly, I'm just reviewing from my chapter 2 test for physics. It shouldn't take anything more than kinematics.
 
Ok, well then use that equation. you should be getting 1.75.
not sure how you're solving your quadratic...?
 
Your kinematic equation is fine. Redo your solution. (You must have made an arithmetic error.)
 
Your quadratic equation is correct, but your solution is wrong. if you write down your solution explicitly, then I can see where it went wrong.
 
wow. just kidding. sorry.

stupid, stupid mistake. instead of 4ac in the quadratic I used 2ac. I was just so convinced that I was right -.-

thank you everyone.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K