Kinematics question: Projectile trajectory given velocity, height at one instant

Click For Summary
A ball is shot into the air, reaching a maximum height of 10.45m with an initial velocity of 7.8i + 6.5j at 8.3m height. To find the magnitude of velocity just before it hits the ground, it is important to use the correct initial conditions and height values. Using the maximum height for calculations may introduce rounding errors, so starting from the height of 8.3m is recommended for accuracy. Different methods can yield the same final results, but some are simpler and less error-prone. Understanding these nuances helps clarify the projectile's trajectory and velocity calculations.
edgarpokemon
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Thread title amended to be more descriptive of the problem

Homework Statement


A ball is shot from ground into the air. at height 8.3m, its velocity is 7.8i + 6.5j. Find Maximum height rise, horizontal distance traveled and magnitude of velocity just before the ball hits the ground.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So i got the total height. i got 10.45. My question is in part of magnitude of velocity as it hits the ground. So if the ball reaches a height of 10.45m, then would i use v^2=vo^2+2a(dy) to find final vertical component of velocity. So if the ball reaches a maximum height of 10.45m. then isn't dy=10.45? it says in the solution that i should use 8.3m for dy, but why? if the ball is at 10.45?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the ball's velocity when it has just returned to 8.3m height?
 
that would be -6.5m/s. but why would it not work like i want to do it? I noticed that at 10.45, the ball will not have the same speed of 6.5, but greater. so if i calculate the velocity at 10.45 then can i solve for the final velocity of j as the ball hits the ground? problaby not jaja, but why not?
 
edgarpokemon said:
would i use v^2=vo^2+2a(dy) to find final vertical component of velocity
Yes, that will work, provided you use the right value for v0 there.
However, there is a disadvantage in this method. In declaring the max height to be 10.45 you would have done some rounding. Using that as the starting point for the next stage of calculation unnecessarily introduces some inaccuracy. For that reason, it would be better to start again and consider the whole trajectory from height 8.3m to ground in one calculation. Or use Simon's method, which produces the same equation.
 
edgarpokemon said:
that would be -6.5m/s. but why would it not work like i want to do it? I noticed that at 10.45, the ball will not have the same speed of 6.5, but greater. so if i calculate the velocity at 10.45 then can i solve for the final velocity of j as the ball hits the ground? problaby not jaja, but why not?
It would totally work but what haruspex said about rounding errors.
At y=10.45m the speed should be less, not more... but both approaches should give the same answers for the speed when the ball hits the ground.
You use the same equation, but vo is different.

There are a number of different approaches. None are more right than the others but some are easier and less prone to error.
 
aaaa i see i guess i over thinked it too much! i understand now oh my goshhh thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K