Kinetic Energy-Mass conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShamelessGit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the threshold kinetic energy required to create an anti-proton by colliding two protons, with one proton initially at rest. The key equations involved include the relativistic kinetic energy formula, Kinetic energy = √(mc²/(1-(v/c)²)) - mc², and the momentum conservation equation, Momentum = mv/√(1-(v/c)²). The solution approach emphasizes using conservation of energy and momentum, and it is suggested that utilizing the center of mass (CM) frame simplifies the calculations significantly. The participant expresses confusion over the complexity of the problem and seeks confirmation on the correctness of their equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts, specifically kinetic energy and momentum.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion in special relativity.
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in physics, particularly energy and momentum conservation.
  • Experience with center of mass frame analysis in collision problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the center of mass frame in relativistic collisions.
  • Learn how to derive and apply the relativistic kinetic energy formula in various scenarios.
  • Explore examples of particle collisions in high-energy physics to reinforce understanding.
  • Review the principles of conservation of energy and momentum in both classical and relativistic contexts.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying special relativity, as well as educators and anyone interested in high-energy particle physics and collision dynamics.

ShamelessGit
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to learn relativity on my own by doing practice problems on the internet. One of the ones I'm having difficulty with is one where you have to calculate the threshold kinetic energy necessary to create an anti-proton by smashing two protons together. I think you assume that one proton is at rest and the other smashes it, and then all 3 protons and the anti-proton move together at the same speed after the collision. You have to create a proton as well as an anti-proton in order to conserve charge.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy = √(mc^2/(1-(v/c)^2)) - mc^2
Momentum = mv/√(1-(v/c)^2)

Rest energy = mc^2

Energy and momentum conserved


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that I'd try to solve it the same way I'd try to solve for an elastic collision in classical physics, which is by setting up the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum and then by solving the system of equations.

I get:

K1 + M1 = K2 + M2

P1 = P2

P stands for momentum, K stands for kinetic energy, and M stands for mass energy.

This is the second time I've tried to work it this way. The first time I actually tried to solve it algebraically, which is a mess, and I found that I had set up an inconsistent system when I finally had rearranged everything and substituted. I figured I must have just set up the equation wrong and I tried again a few days later (today), but I noticed that this question is a part of a test that students would have to take and it is only worth 1 point, which is the same amount of points given to much easier questions, such as a simple Doppler-shift calculation, or simply writing down the Lorentz transformations (without having to use them). So I'm thinking that there must be a much easier solution to this problem? Also, are the equations I wrote down correct? I haven't actually tried to substitute anything this time because I can see that it will be an awful problem and probably not what the instructor was looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ShamelessGit said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to learn relativity on my own by doing practice problems on the internet. One of the ones I'm having difficulty with is one where you have to calculate the threshold kinetic energy necessary to create an anti-proton by smashing two protons together. I think you assume that one proton is at rest and the other smashes it, and then all 3 protons and the anti-proton move together at the same speed after the collision. You have to create a proton as well as an anti-proton in order to conserve charge.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy = √(mc^2/(1-(v/c)^2)) - mc^2
Momentum = mv/√(1-(v/c)^2)

Rest energy = mc^2

Energy and momentum conserved


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that I'd try to solve it the same way I'd try to solve for an elastic collision in classical physics, which is by setting up the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum and then by solving the system of equations.

I get:

K1 + M1 = K2 + M2

P1 = P2

P stands for momentum, K stands for kinetic energy, and M stands for mass energy.

This is the second time I've tried to work it this way. The first time I actually tried to solve it algebraically, which is a mess, and I found that I had set up an inconsistent system when I finally had rearranged everything and substituted. I figured I must have just set up the equation wrong and I tried again a few days later (today), but I noticed that this question is a part of a test that students would have to take and it is only worth 1 point, which is the same amount of points given to much easier questions, such as a simple Doppler-shift calculation, or simply writing down the Lorentz transformations (without having to use them). So I'm thinking that there must be a much easier solution to this problem? Also, are the equations I wrote down correct? I haven't actually tried to substitute anything this time because I can see that it will be an awful problem and probably not what the instructor was looking for.

Such problems are almost always much easier if you go to the so-called "center of mass (CM) frame", in which the initial (and final) total momentum = 0. That is what physicists do: carry out the basics in the CM frame, then transform afterwards into other frames if needed.
 
You're right! That does make it so much easier! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K