- #1
Skeet_man
- 2
- 0
Kinda looking to confirm what I already suspect.
All things being equal, if two objects have the same kinetic energy, does the fact that one is larger and heavier than the other (although at a slower velocity) mean anything?
Specifically when comparing bullets. One bullet .451" in diameter, 230 grains in weight, traveling at 880 feet per second. Second bullet .356" in diameter, 124 grains in weight, traveling 1200fps. Both bullets have 396 ft/lb of kinetic energy. However, in a somewhat ad-hoc comparison against targets, the larger slower bullet is ostensibly being shown to impart more force on the target, causing it to tip over, whereas the faster lighter bullet fails to do so.
To my mind, at least in this instance, ft/lb is ft/lb.
All things being equal, if two objects have the same kinetic energy, does the fact that one is larger and heavier than the other (although at a slower velocity) mean anything?
Specifically when comparing bullets. One bullet .451" in diameter, 230 grains in weight, traveling at 880 feet per second. Second bullet .356" in diameter, 124 grains in weight, traveling 1200fps. Both bullets have 396 ft/lb of kinetic energy. However, in a somewhat ad-hoc comparison against targets, the larger slower bullet is ostensibly being shown to impart more force on the target, causing it to tip over, whereas the faster lighter bullet fails to do so.
To my mind, at least in this instance, ft/lb is ft/lb.