Kinetic Inductance: Combining Self-Inductance & Kinetic

AI Thread Summary
Self-inductance and kinetic inductance can indeed be combined in the same model, as they both contribute to the overall inductance in a circuit. Kinetic inductance arises from the finite mass of charge carriers, while self-inductance is related to the magnetic field generated by current flow. Understanding both concepts is crucial for advanced applications in superconducting circuits and high-frequency electronics. Resources such as the Wikipedia page on kinetic inductance provide foundational knowledge and further reading. Combining these inductances allows for more accurate modeling of complex electrical systems.
dirad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can self-inductance and kinetic inductance be combined in the same model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dirad said:
can self-inductance and kinetic inductance be combined in the same model?

I'm familiar with self-inductance, but not familiar with Kinetic inductance. Could you please post more information and some links to references? Thanks.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

4 Pole Induction Motor Working Principle
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How can we prove the kinetic energy equation
Replies
2
Views
1K
I The "problem" of Induction and conservation laws
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why do some devices work for a short time after unplugged?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Question about Capacitor current and electromagnetic induction
Replies
16
Views
1K
What factors determine the resistance and inductance in a coil?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Torque and Rotational Kinetic Energy Relationship
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Self excited induction generators and grid connected solar inverters?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Mutual inductance of bifilar winding, vs transmission line parameter
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top