Kinetic Inductance: Combining Self-Inductance & Kinetic

AI Thread Summary
Self-inductance and kinetic inductance can indeed be combined in the same model, as they both contribute to the overall inductance in a circuit. Kinetic inductance arises from the finite mass of charge carriers, while self-inductance is related to the magnetic field generated by current flow. Understanding both concepts is crucial for advanced applications in superconducting circuits and high-frequency electronics. Resources such as the Wikipedia page on kinetic inductance provide foundational knowledge and further reading. Combining these inductances allows for more accurate modeling of complex electrical systems.
dirad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can self-inductance and kinetic inductance be combined in the same model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dirad said:
can self-inductance and kinetic inductance be combined in the same model?

I'm familiar with self-inductance, but not familiar with Kinetic inductance. Could you please post more information and some links to references? Thanks.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top