Kirchhoff's Junction Rule in the AC case....

  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac Junction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Kirchhoff's Junction Rule as it applies to AC circuits, particularly the implications of having multiple AC currents with different phases entering a junction and the concept of net current at that node. Participants explore the physical meaning of zero net current in the context of AC, contrasting it with DC behavior and addressing potential charge accumulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Kirchhoff's laws are applicable to both DC and AC circuits, although they may become approximations at high frequencies.
  • One participant questions the physical interpretation of zero net current at a junction in an AC circuit, suggesting it may imply charge accumulation.
  • Another participant explains that in AC circuits, currents can be represented in complex vector form, which can sum to zero, similar to how opposing DC currents can also sum to zero.
  • There is a suggestion that thinking about charge velocity in AC circuits may complicate understanding, and a higher-level perspective might be more beneficial.
  • A participant introduces a mathematical example involving cosine functions to illustrate the concept of superposition in three-phase systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of zero net current in AC circuits, with some emphasizing the mathematical representation while others focus on the physical interpretation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the deeper physical meaning of these observations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the need for instantaneous current considerations in AC circuits and the use of complex numbers, indicating that assumptions about charge behavior may vary based on the perspective taken.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Kirchhoff's laws are valid for DC circuit and also for AC circuits (up to point. I think they become only approximations at high frequencies).

Let's consider a node (junction) in a AC circuit. Three AC currents with the same magnitude but different relative phases enter the node. It is possible for zero current to exit the node, correct? It seems strange though that 3 currents enter and no current leaves the node. That cannot happen in DC: no charge accumulation can happen at any point in the circuit.

But what does it physically mean that in the AC case the net current exiting the node is zero? That there is some charge accumulation and that the charge does not have an instantaneous velocity at that point? thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no mystery. The currents (in complex vector form) simply add up to zero.

Consider a DC wire. We have a 1 amp current traveling to the left and 1 amp traveling to the right. They add up to zero; no current. Why is that mysterious?
 
fog37 said:
Kirchhoff's laws are valid for DC circuit and also for AC circuits (up to point. I think they become only approximations at high frequencies).

Let's consider a node (junction) in a AC circuit. Three AC currents with the same magnitude but different relative phases enter the node. It is possible for zero current to exit the node, correct? It seems strange though that 3 currents enter and no current leaves the node. That cannot happen in DC: no charge accumulation can happen at any point in the circuit.

But what does it physically mean that in the AC case the net current exiting the node is zero? That there is some charge accumulation and that the charge does not have an instantaneous velocity at that point?thanks!

Lets
For simplicity let's assume the AC current is a sine wave with a magnitude of 1V and a frequency of 1 Hz.

The voltage waveform will start at zero, increase to 1, decrease to 0, decrease to -1, etc...

so if our AC signal is going into an element, the actual instantaneous current going into the element is going to switch between positive and negative.

also don't forget that sin(x)= -sin(ft+180)

if we have two signals waves A and B

A=sin(ft)
B=sin(ft+180)

you can say that both signals go into an element from different directions.Does that make sense?
 
fog37 said:
But what does it physically mean that in the AC case the net current exiting the node is zero? That there is some charge accumulation and that the charge does not have an instantaneous velocity at that point?

When you're dealing with circuitry like this, thinking of the velocity of charge is going to confuse the hell out of you. Think of it at a higher level unless for some reason you need to look into it with that level of complexity.
 
Also a third way of saying the same thing, for three phase systems.

What is the numerical value of COS(0)+COS(2*pi/3)+cos(-2*pi/3)? All angles are in radians.
 
Hello,

sure, COS(0)+COS(2*pi/3)+cos(-2*pi/3)=0. It is as if three mono-phase generators where connected together Superposition)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K