Kirchhoff's Law: Solving Matrix Inverse on HP 48GX

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving matrix inverses related to Kirchhoff's Law using the HP 48GX calculator. The user attempts to compute the inverse of a 3x3 matrix representing circuit equations but encounters difficulties, particularly in obtaining results consistent with classmates using TI 3600 calculators. The matrix in question involves equations for current and voltage, specifically [A]^-1 x [X], where A is defined by circuit parameters. The user ultimately resolves the issue by reassessing their approach to inputting the matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Law and its application in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with matrix operations, specifically matrix inversion
  • Experience using HP 48GX calculators for mathematical computations
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuit equations and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to perform matrix inversion on HP 48GX calculators
  • Learn about matrix operations in TI 3600 calculators for comparison
  • Study Kirchhoff's Law in-depth, focusing on practical applications in circuit design
  • Explore methods for converting decimal values to fractions in calculator software
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, particularly those working with circuit analysis and matrix operations, as well as anyone using HP 48GX calculators for mathematical computations.

nightwing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is more of a calculator problem, we are currently doing Kirchhoff's Law in class and we are using the equation [A]^-1 x [X], where A is a 3x3 matrix containing the I3=I1+I2 and the V Rise and V Drop equations and the X is a matrix of the voltage values.
Ex.(I1)=(I2)+(I3) Loop 1= 12=(I1)5+(I2)4+10 Loop 2= (I3)2=10+(I2)4
0=-I1+I2+I3 0=(I1)5+(I2)4+10-12 0=10+(I2)4-(I3)2
[[-1 1 1] ^-1 [[ 0 ]
[ 5 4 0] x [ 2 ]
[ 0 4 -2]] [-10]]
But herein lies my problem, I have an HP 48GX, and it will not allow me to take the inverse of the first equation. I tried to take the inverse of each individual number as i entered it into the matrix, but the answer that i derived was not the same as those of my fellow classmates, all of whom are using TI 3600's. So how would i go about fixing this problem. And on a smaller note, is it possible to convert a decemile into a fraction? Thanx.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
never mind, i just had to stop being a moron
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K