Kirchoff's Voltage Law in RLC circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Kirchoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in an RLC circuit, specifically addressing the setup of circuit equations involving alternating voltage sources. The user, Andrew, seeks clarification on the interpretation of phase angles (30 degrees and 45 degrees) and the notation of voltage differences (Eab = 10). The consensus is that the angles indicate the phase of the alternating sources, and Eab represents the voltage of point 'a' relative to point 'b'. The correct formulation of KVL equations involves expressing voltages as complex quantities to align with the nature of alternating currents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law (V = IR)
  • Knowledge of phasor representation in AC circuits
  • Basic concepts of alternating current (AC) and phase angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study phasor representation and its application in AC circuit analysis
  • Learn how to derive KVL equations for RLC circuits with complex voltages
  • Explore Steinmetz notation and its significance in electrical engineering
  • Practice solving simultaneous equations in AC circuit problems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing RLC circuits using Kirchoff's Voltage Law.

majin_andrew
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am required to write KVL circuit equations for the following circuit

KirchoffRCL.jpg


I don't need to finish solving for I1, I2, I3 and I4 at the moment. I just need a bit of help setting up the equations. Thanks.

Homework Equations



Kirchoff's Voltage Law, which states that the sum of voltage drops in a loop must be equal to the sum of the voltage rises.

Ohm's Law, V = IR

The Attempt at a Solution



There are a few things I am unsure of.

The first is that I don't know what the 30 degrees and the 45 degrees refers to beside the voltage sources. My first guess was that it means the phase that the alternating voltage source was up to at that particular moment in time, but I'm not sure if EA is even alternating, because it doesn't have the squigly line in the circle. In my attempted solution I guessed that both EA and Eab are alternating, and that the angle given refers to where in the phase it is at that point in time (with 0 degrees at the peak).

Another thing I'm unsure of is is the notation of Eab = 10. Does this mean the the potential at a is 10 higher than the potential at b? Or the other way around? I am unsure of the direction of the voltage. For my attempted solution I guessed that 'a' had the higher potential.

Anyway, here is my attempt at a solution:
Eab= 10 cos(30 degrees) = -20*I1

Eab= 10 cos (30 degrees) = 60*j*I2

Eab + EA= 10 cos (30 degrees) + 20 cos (45 degrees) = -30*-j*I3 = 30*j*I3

...
and from here I would be able to perform simultaneous equations to find the currents.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
majin_andrew said:

The Attempt at a Solution



There are a few things I am unsure of.

The first is that I don't know what the 30 degrees and the 45 degrees refers to beside the voltage sources. My first guess was that it means the phase that the alternating voltage source was up to at that particular moment in time, but I'm not sure if EA is even alternating, because it doesn't have the squigly line in the circle. In my attempted solution I guessed that both EA and Eab are alternating, and that the angle given refers to where in the phase it is at that point in time (with 0 degrees at the peak).
It's called Steinmetz notation. It just tells you the amplitude and relative phase of the signal. In your problem, E_{ab}=10 \cos(\omega t+30^\circ) and E_A = 20 \cos(\omega t+45^\circ).
Another thing I'm unsure of is is the notation of Eab = 10. Does this mean the the potential at a is 10 higher than the potential at b? Or the other way around? I am unsure of the direction of the voltage. For my attempted solution I guessed that 'a' had the higher potential.
"Higher" probably isn't the best word to use since it's an alternating source. The subscript "ab" usually means that you're measuring the voltage of point a relative to point b.
 
Both the things you said make sense. Thanks vela!
 
So, with this new understanding, I think the KVL equations are:

E_{ab}=10 \cos(\omega t+30^\circ) = -20*I1

E_{ab}=10 \cos(\omega t+30^\circ) = 60*j*I2

E_{ab} + E_A= 10 \cos(\omega t+30^\circ) + 20 \cos(\omega t+45^\circ) = -30*-j*I3 = 30*j*I3

Which can then be solved to obtain the currents. Is this correct?
 
Essentially, but you have a slight problem. The lefthand sides are real while the righthand sides are complex. You want to represent the voltages as a complex quantity and use that on the LHS of the equations.
 
Ok thanks. Representing the voltage as a complex quantity:

E_{ab}=10e^{\frac{\pi}{6}j}e^{j\omega t}=-20I_{1}

E_{ab}=10e^{\frac{\pi}{6}j}e^{j\omega t}=60jI_{2}

E_{ab} + E_A=10e^{\frac{\pi}{6}j}e^{j\omega t}+20e^{\frac{\pi}{4}j}e^{j\omega t}=-30jI_{3}
 
That's good. The notation is for representing phasors, so you don't actually need to write in the frequency factor explicitly. It's assumed to be in there.
 
Ok thanks a lot for your help vela!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K