A Klein paradox in the massless case

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
I have a question about the Klein paradox in the massless case, for a potential step of height ##V_0## (this is exactly the situation described by Wikipedia). I don't have a problem to understand the "paradox", and I think the Wikipedia's illustration is quite telling.
My question is : what append at the limit case ##E_0 = V_0## ? The "wave function" after the step is constant (##k=0##), and the Dirac equation for the spinor's components ##\Psi_1##, ##\Psi_2## become ##0 = 0##... Thus there are no conditions for the value of those components. If I choose ##\Psi_1 = \Psi_2 = 1## for example, I still get ##T=1##. If I choose ##\Psi_1 = -\Psi_2 = 1##, I get ##R=1##. I "understand" this with the fact that at the node the group velocity is not defined.
So what would really happen in real life ?

400px-Dispersion1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit : By continuity of ##T(E)## I would say that the good answer is ##T=1##. Also if I end the step potential (I take a potential barrier), the electron coming from the left has to pass the barrier, as it can't change its group velocity. So for me ##T## is always ##1##, even in the pathological case ##E=V_0##.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top