Know acceleration as a function of position, can I find velocity?

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration of a pendulum can be expressed as a function of angle, and velocity can be found by integrating acceleration with respect to angle, but this requires careful consideration of the integration constant. Dimensional analysis raises concerns about the validity of this approach, particularly when integrating angular acceleration twice, which leads to contradictions in units. The correct method involves using the chain rule to relate angular velocity and acceleration, allowing for proper integration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between angular quantities and their dimensions. Overall, the integration process must be approached with attention to the correct variables and their relationships.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello I know acceleration of a pendulum as a function of angle. Can I find velocity by integration with respect to theta? My intuition says yes, but dimensional analysis tells me otherwise. What is right and wrong?

And what about work? Can I integrate tau = Ia with respect to theta and find work?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jonsson said:
Hello I know acceleration of a pendulum as a function of angle. Can I find velocity by integration with respect to theta?
Yes, to within a constant of integration.

My intuition says yes, but dimensional analysis tells me otherwise. What is right and wrong?
Show us your dimensional analysis and we'll be more able to help.

And what about work? Can I integrate tau = Ia with respect to theta and find work?
yes (assuming that ##\tau## is a torque and ##a## is the angular acceleration).
 
Last edited:
I have acceleration, ##\vec{\alpha}(\theta)## for the pendulum given by:

$$
\vec{\alpha}(\theta) = -\hat{k}\left( \frac{L\,m\,g}{I} \right) \sin\theta
$$If I could use integration to find ##\omega##:

$$
\vec{\omega}(\theta) = \hat{k}\left( \frac{L\,m\,g}{I} \right) \cos\theta + \vec{C}
$$

But If could integrate again:

$$
\vec{\theta}(\theta) = -\vec{\alpha} + \vec{C}\theta + \vec{D}
$$

Question 1: Surely that cannot make sense? ## \vec{\theta}## as a function of itself?

Question 2: And looking at units, ##\alpha## is angular acceleration, so it must have units ##\rm s^{-2}##, if I integrate twice, i basically multiply by ##\theta## twice, which is dimensionless so I get ##\vec{\theta}(\theta) : \rm s^{-2}##. #\vec{\theta}## should have no dimensions. So think I have a contradiction. What is correct?

What have I misunderstood?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Last edited:
Your first integration is wrong. \alpha is d\omega/dt, not d\omega/d\theta so you cannot integrate the right side with respect to \theta as it stands. You can use the chain rule to write d\omega/dt= (d\omega/d\theta)(d\theta/dt)= \omega d\omega/d\theta. So you can write your equation as
\omega d\omega/d\theta= -k\left(\frac{Lmg}{I}\right)sin(\theta)
which, when you separate variables, becomes
\omega d\omega= -k\left(\frac{Lmg}{I}\right)sin(\theta)d\theta

and integrate both sides.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top