Knowing if the elevator is moving or not

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ubergewehr273
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Instruments
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
19 replies · 2K views
ubergewehr273
Messages
139
Reaction score
5
Consider a hypothetical scenario where you are present in an elevator which is either at rest or is moving with constant velocity (ignore cases of acceleration when elevator stops/starts moving). Now how will you determine if the elevator is moving or not given that there are no windows in the elevator. You may use any instrument of your choice to determine the case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
Physics news on Phys.org
All motion is relative. So the elevator is always still in one reference frame and moving in different reference frames. So the answer is that you can't measure it, nor can you define it in a frame invariant manner.

The computer on your desk is moving right now in the reference frame of the moon. Can you measure that?
 
anorlunda said:
All motion is relative. So the elevator is always still in one reference frame and moving in different reference frames. So the answer is that you can't measure it, nor can you define it in a frame invariant manner.

The computer on your desk is moving right now in the reference frame of the moon. Can you measure that?
Ok let's say that I wanted to know if the elevator is moving or not in the frame of reference of the earth.
 
anorlunda said:
The answer is still no.
Why? I made the reference frame specific.
 
Ashes Panigrahi said:
Consider a hypothetical scenario where you are present in an elevator which is either at rest or is moving with constant velocity (ignore cases of acceleration when elevator stops/starts moving). Now how will you determine if the elevator is moving or not given that there are no windows in the elevator. You may use any instrument of your choice to determine the case.

Measure changes in the gravitational field strength.

Measure the Coriolis force.

Use the Earth's magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and mfb
PeroK said:
Measure changes in the gravitational field strength.
Measure the Coriolis force.
Use the Earth's magnetic field.
Any of these could, in principle, be used to determine whether the elevator is moving relative to the Earth (although it would be a good exercise to calculate the strength of these effects - there's a reason why we use GPS signals instead of these other effects for navigation).

The important point that OP must understand is that all of these techniques, whether practical or not, are not answering the question "Is the elevator moving?", and in fact that question is altogether meaningless. They are answering a different question, namely "Are the elevator and the Earth moving relative to one another?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon
Nugatory said:
"Is the elevator moving?", and in fact that question is altogether meaningless.
Not so much meaningless, as it is the "ah-ha" moment when you realize you CANNOT tell it is from the inside, meaning there is no preferred reference frame.
 
Last edited:
jerromyjon said:
Not so much meaningless, as it is the "ah-ha" moment when you realize you CANNOT tell it is from the inside, meaning there is no preferred reference frame.
Does that imply that you could tell it is moving from the outside?

In terms of the original question, the closed elevator is a red herring. You could be in a glass elevator on the outside of a skyscraper and the same argument applies. The question of whether you are absolutely in motion is meaningless.
 
This is a typical PF conversation. It starts with a very basic scenario and then it gets more and more complicated. The problem arises because the initial question is seldom specified sufficiently. If it were then the odds are that the OP would already have thought out the answer.
The basic answer to the basic question has to be 'No' but, the elevator could be moving very fast and over a great distance (unlikely) and then the changes in g and air pressure could give a clue and so could Coriolis. - "Any instrument of your choice" makes things more interesting and much harder.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Khashishi, Vanadium 50 and jerromyjon
Read some af the works by Albert Einstein. Among other things, he pointed out that to be an unanswerable question.
 
Ashes Panigrahi said:
...there are no windows...
Do you literally just mean that there no windows, or do you mean that no measurements relying on interaction with the outside are allowed?
 
Tom.G said:
Read some af the works by Albert Einstein. Among other things, he pointed out that to be an unanswerable question.
I have read some of his helpful pictures and models. Some of them are excellent but I think he suffered from being very much brighter than his audience and he didn't always realize just how literal they could be. If he had specified all those pictures as tightly as really necessary, the story would have been longer and more convoluted than the original bit of theory he was trying to get across.
Can't blame him, though.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Can't you just count the number of chimes as you cross floors? :devil:
Not every building with an elevator has the facility of chimes.
 
Hmm. Getting adequate GPS signals indoors is problematic at best...

May we assume that the shaft / cab combo are sufficiently ventilated to prevent a 'Tube Train' piston 'Whoosh' ?
Some out-door watches & GPS devices also have a barometer function; If you ride cab for half a dozen floors, there should be a non-trivial change. This may not be accurate enough to choose the floor, but surely proof of concept.
 
Nik_2213 said:
Some out-door watches & GPS devices also have a barometer function
Sounds like the old "how many ways can you use a barometer to measure the height of the Empire State Building" puzzle... Bribe the elevator operator with a barometer to have him tell you whether it's moving.

Or ask an accountant how fast it is moving. And let him ask you what you want the answer to be.