Lagrangian/Hamiltonian of a charged particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of formulating a non-relativistic Lagrangian for a charged particle that accounts for its own electromagnetic field, as described by Lienard-Wiechert potentials. It highlights the complexity of achieving self-consistent dynamical equations for point particles and electromagnetic fields, particularly due to issues like radiation reaction, which are inadequately addressed by existing equations such as the Landau-Lifshitz and Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equations. The conversation also touches on the necessity of a relativistic framework for consistent dynamics and the exploration of interaction terms within a relativistic Lagrangian. Participants reference various academic papers to illustrate these challenges and suggest further reading for deeper understanding. The topic underscores the ongoing difficulties in reconciling classical electrodynamics with quantum mechanics.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
I know that a moving particle is subjected to its own field according to Lienard-Wiechert potentials. But is it possible to write a non-relativistic Lagrangian which, upon variation of the action, give rise to the "correct" equation of motion? If such a Lagrangian/Hamiltonian exists, then is it possible to quantize it and use it in the Schrodinger equation?

This is just a curiosity, I'm not looking for some rigorous explanations. I tried googling "Lienard-Wiechert Lagragian", but I couldn't understand most of the results. "Lagrangian of a charged particle" was an other try, but all the articles I've found talked about an external field, which is not what I was looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very complicated issue, and for point particles it's not possible to give an exact system of self-consistent dynamical equations of the electromagnetic field and a point particle. It's the notorious problem of radiation reaction. The best approximation known today is the Landau-Lifshitz equation, which is an approximation of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation which has serious problems (self-acceleration, acausal solutions).

The problem is solved within continuum mechanics. A somewhat artificial but very nice model is the motion of a Born-rigid charged body:

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508031
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702078

Note that a fully consistent dynamics of a closed system of charges and em. fields is necessarily relativistic!
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
vanhees71 said:
Note that a fully consistent dynamics of a closed system of charges and em. fields is necessarily relativistic!
Is there a relativistic Lagrangian that can describe this process? I mean, the Lagrangian of EM field is know, the relativistic Lagrangian of the point particle is also know. What about the interaction part ? Is there a know way to explicitly write it in relativistic therms ?
 
See the 2nd paper quoted in #2. As I said for a point particle there are notorious problems which cannot be solved since ~1910!
 
Do you mean Medina R 2006 Am. J. Phys. 74 1031–1034 ?
 
No I mean what I quoted above:

R. Medina, Lagrangian of the quasi-rigid charge
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702078

To understand the problem better, I recommend the other paper by Medina, which gives also a review on the problems with point particles:

R. Medina, Lagrangian of the quasi-rigid extended charge
https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508031

Of course there's also a chapter about it in Jackson's textbook on electrodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
Ah ok I though they were exclusively on rigid particles. I will have lot for sure. Thanks for the material.
 
Back
Top