Lagrangian Mechanics: Constrained Systems Q&A

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Lagrange multipliers in Lagrangian mechanics, specifically regarding constrained systems. A user seeks clarification on how the method of Lagrange multipliers, typically used for constrained minimization, is applied to find extrema of the Action functional. There is a lack of responses to the inquiry, indicating a need for more engagement on the topic. The conversation highlights the intersection of mathematical methods and physical principles in mechanics. Understanding this application is crucial for solving problems involving constraints in Lagrangian systems.
Curl
Messages
756
Reaction score
0
Is anyone good with Lagrangian mechanics applied to constrained systems?

I had a question about the Lagrange multiplier method, maybe I should have posted it in this section.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=550139
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking why Lagrange multipilers are a way to do constrained minimization?
 
I'm asking how is the method of Lagrange Multipliers (which is used to find the extrema of level surfaces subject to constraints) used to find the extrema of the Action functional.

I thought I'd be more of a math question but nobody there is throwing me an answer.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

The Lagrange equations from mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
What is the logic behind Lagrangian mechanics?
Replies
23
Views
3K
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
2K
I Types of symmetries in Lagrangian mechanics
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Checking if a stationary point is a minimum using Lagrangian Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Adding total time derivative to Lagrangian/Canonical Transformations
Replies
2
Views
191
I Calculus Question within Lagrangian mechanics
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Lagrangian mechanics - generalised coordinates question
Replies
4
Views
1K
The definition of generalised momentum
Replies
43
Views
4K
Lagrangian mechanics -- Initial questions
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top