Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Hamiltonian of a free electron gas in the presence of a magnetic field, specifically addressing the absence of a spin-magnetic field interaction term. Participants explore the implications of this omission and its relation to Landau diamagnetism and other magnetic behaviors.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions why the Hamiltonian does not include a spin-magnetic field interaction term, suggesting it may be due to its small magnitude compared to kinetic energy terms.
- Another participant argues that any spin-magnetic interaction would align magnetic moments with the field, leading to paramagnetic behavior, which is overshadowed by the diamagnetic response of free electron orbits.
- A later reply reiterates the question about the absence of the spin-magnetic field term, proposing that it is indeed small relative to kinetic energy.
- One participant mentions that the omission is a simplification to explain Landau diamagnetism and notes that a complete Hamiltonian would include the electron spin magnetic moment interacting with the magnetic field, which leads to Pauli paramagnetism.
- Another participant highlights that there is also a kinetic energy term in the direction parallel to the applied field that should be considered.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the significance and implications of the spin-magnetic field interaction term in the Hamiltonian. There is no consensus on whether its omission is justified or what the complete Hamiltonian should include.
Contextual Notes
Some participants acknowledge that the discussion simplifies complex phenomena, such as the de Haas-Van Alphen oscillations and the relationship between diamagnetism and paramagnetism, without fully resolving these complexities.