Laplace & Inverse Laplace transforms

Cocoleia
Messages
293
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I am given this equation:
upload_2018-1-18_16-39-58.png

and asked to solve using Laplace transforms

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I did:
upload_2018-1-18_16-41-29.png

upload_2018-1-18_16-41-56.png

This seemed logical to me, I used partial fractions and it stayed pretty simple.

This is what the solutions my prof posted do:
upload_2018-1-18_16-42-33.png


Is my answer equivalent to this, or are their faults in my logic and work ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-18_16-39-58.png
    upload_2018-1-18_16-39-58.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 962
  • upload_2018-1-18_16-41-29.png
    upload_2018-1-18_16-41-29.png
    52.6 KB · Views: 1,121
  • upload_2018-1-18_16-41-56.png
    upload_2018-1-18_16-41-56.png
    63.7 KB · Views: 981
  • upload_2018-1-18_16-42-33.png
    upload_2018-1-18_16-42-33.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 1,493
on Phys.org
One problem I can see with your work is where you write:
upload_2018-1-18_17-12-40.png

##(s^2 + 9) \neq (s - 3)(s + 3)##
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-18_17-12-40.png
    upload_2018-1-18_17-12-40.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 477
Also,
s^2 + 6s + 8 does not factor to (s-2)(s-4). Poles in the rt-hand plane are bad business!
 
Cocoleia said:

Homework Statement


I am given this equation:
View attachment 218670
and asked to solve using Laplace transforms

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I did:
View attachment 218671
View attachment 218672
This seemed logical to me, I used partial fractions and it stayed pretty simple.

This is what the solutions my prof posted do:
View attachment 218673

Is my answer equivalent to this, or are their faults in my logic and work ?
Their (sic) are faults in your work ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K