Laplace transform: function defined by parts

libelec
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
I have this DE:

\[y&#039;&#039; - 4y&#039; + 8y = f(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l}<br /> t{\rm{ }},t \in [0,2) \\ <br /> t + 1{\rm{ }},t \in [2,4) \\ <br /> 0{\rm{ }},t \ge 4 \\ <br /> \end{array} \right.\]<br />

I have problems transforming f(t). I know that when I have a function defined by parts, I have to use the translation theorem. But for t > 4, f(t) = 0 would let me something like \[f(t) = t.H(t) + 1.H(t + 2) + 0.H(t + 4)\]<br />, the 3rd term being irrelevant.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, you did your shifting wrong.
You want to shift H(t) to the right, so you substract the shifting amount from the argument.
Second of all, the third term must be relevant, because you need it to cancel out the two first term, so the function will vanish.
So your function looks actually like this:
f(t)=tH(t)+H(t-2)-(t+1)H(t-4)
 
Damn, you're right. I made some stupid mistakes there.

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top