Laplace transform of 2du/dt+1 in transfer function

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter james_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Example
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views · last reply
james_a
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So I am reading a handout on transfer functions, and I got to this one example that doesn't seem right to me - which usually means I'm missing something.

It looks like this:
Worked example text: a linear ODE d2y/dt2 + 5 dy/dt + 6y = 2 du/dt + 1; transfer function H(s) = (2s+1)/(s^2+5s+6), factored as (1/2)(s+1/2)/((s+3)(s+2)), giving a zero at s = -1/2 and poles at s = -3 and s = -2.


My understanding is that the numerator in H(s) is supposed to be the laplace transform of the input for the differential equation, so N(s)=L{2du/dt+1}.

I'm not sure how the author got {2du/dt+1}=2s+1. Isn't L{1} supposed to be 1/s? And I'm not sure what to make of L{2du/dt}.

Maybe the author is using "u" to notate the unit step function, so du/dt would be the dirac delta function δ(t), and L{2δ(t)}=2 . Still, where does 2s come from? Why wouldn't they have just written 2δ(t) in the first place? And that still doesn't explain how, apparently, according to the author L{1}=1.

Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A derivative in the t-space gives multiplication by s in the s-space. And integration in the t-space gives division by s in the s-space.

(For proofs, see

and
 
Last edited: