Laplace transform of a piecewise function

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 3K views
Lorens
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
What is the laplace transform of

http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/8145/laplacetransform6wk.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the section entitled "Homework Help" in the Physics Forums Global Guidelines which you agreed to:

NOTE: You MUST show that you have attempted to answer your question in order to receive help.

So what are you got?
 
Tom Mattson said:
According to the section entitled "Homework Help" in the Physics Forums Global Guidelines which you agreed to:
So what are you got?

It isn't so much to test, just to watch a tabel of formula, i know the transform for cos(x), but i can't find any rule which would let me multiplicat it with O(x).

I mean for problems like this you just think, and try to figure out how to do it.
I would say my problem is O(x).

Anyway i got to go to bed now 00:08.. lol...
 
Do you know what [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] is?
 
Tom Mattson said:
Do you know what [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] is?


for [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] t<0 gives t=0 and t>0 gives t=1 and the transform is 1/s, but that knowledge don't help me much :( ...
 
You are right about [itex]\theta(t)[/itex], but that knowledge should help you a great deal.

You have a function that is defined piecewise:

[tex]\theta(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc}0 & t<0\\1 & t \geq 0\end{array}[/tex]

Now, if you multiply [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] by [itex]\cos(t)[/itex], then you just have to multiply both pieces by [itex]\cos(t)[/itex].

So...

[tex]\cos(t)\theta(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc}0 & t<0\\\cos(t) & t \geq 0\end{array}[/tex]

Can you take it from there?
 
Last edited:
You missed that [itex]\theta(o)[/itex]=1/2 my textbook say so, but it don't matter.

Can I ignore [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] seen the laplace transform isn't defined for the second quadrant for the x-axis.

Also i must ask how do you get access to all the special signs?

Thx for your time Lorenz
 
Lorens said:
Can I ignore [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] seen the laplace transform isn't defined for the second quadrant for the x-axis.
It's not a matter of being undefined, but you got the right idea. It's more precise to state that the laplace transform of f doesn't care what values f takes on for x<0.

Also i must ask how do you get access to all the special signs?
Thx for your time Lorenz
What special signs?
 
Like [itex]\theta(t)[/itex] i just copyed him there :smile: