Find the laplace transform of log[x]

Click For Summary
The Laplace transform of log(t) is defined as the integral from 0 to infinity of e^(-st) log(t) dt, but the function log(t) is not defined at t=0, complicating its existence. While the integral diverges at the lower limit, it can be evaluated by setting the lower limit to a small positive value and taking the limit as it approaches zero. The integral can be expressed in terms of the Euler-Mascheroni constant, leading to the result that the Laplace transform equals -(\ln(s) + γ)/s. This shows that despite initial concerns, the Laplace transform can indeed be computed. The discussion highlights the importance of continuity and integrability conditions for the existence of Laplace transforms.
mathelord
how do i find the laplace transform of log[x]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplace transform of \log t is

\int_0^{\infty}e^{-st} \log t dt
 
i know that but i tink the final answer is infinity,thats ridiculus,so i need confirmation
 
I don't think there is a "closed form" expression for the integral but the integral should be finite since log x integrates to x log x - x which goes to 0 as x -> 0.
 
I don't think that this Laplace transform exists. A necessary condition for the existence of the Laplace transform of f(t) is that f be continuous on 0 \leq t < \infty, but \log(t) isn't even defined at t=0.
 
The condition for the existence of the Laplace Transform is that function must be piecewise continuous and of exponential order. In short, it has to be integrable.
 
Tide said:
piecewise continuous
Right, but the interval has to include t=0, where the integrand has a vertical asymptote. Doesn't that screw things up?
 
Last edited:
Tom Mattson said:
Right, but the interval has to include t=0, where the integrand has an infinite discontinuity. Doesn't that screw things up?

Yes, the fact that the discontinuity occurs at t = 0 poses a problem but you can define the Laplace transform by setting the lower limit to \epsilon > 0 and passing to the limit 0.

In fact, we know that the integral

\int_{0}^{\infty}\ln x e^{-x} dx = -\gamma

is just the Euler-Mascheroni constant. We can use this result to evaluate the Laplace transform:

\int_{0}^{\infty} \ln t e^{-st} dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{-\ln s +\ln x}{s}e^{-x}dx

with the result

\int_{0}^{\infty} \ln t e^{-st} dt = - \frac {\ln s + \gamma}{s}

which wasn't as bad as I first thought it would be!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K