Laplace transforms, heaviside step functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Laplace transform involving Heaviside step functions and the treatment of negative signs in expressions. A participant questions why the term e^(-3s)/s is positive despite originating from -u3(t), suggesting it might be a typo. Another participant seeks clarification on rewriting a piecewise function in terms of the Heaviside function, specifically how the negative sign is handled and why it transforms to sin(3(t-pi)). The conversation highlights the application of trigonometric identities and the time-shift property of the Laplace transform to simplify expressions. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical properties and transformations involved in Laplace analysis.
missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! I just have a question regarding some notes I've been looking at and trying to understand...

Homework Statement


eq0018MP.gif

Taking the transform:

eq0019MP.gif


Just wondering, can someone explain to me why the e-3s/s is positive, and not negative because it is originally -u3(t)...

Another quick one:

Write this in terms of Heaviside function:

f(t) =
{ 0, 0 <= t <= pi
{ -sin3t, t >= pi

1) So you would get f(t) = -(upit)sin3t

And somehow it ends up as f(t) = (upit)sin(3(t-pi))
Can someone explain this step as well? Just what happened to the negative in front of it, and why it became 3(t-pi)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
missavvy said:
Hey guys! I just have a question regarding some notes I've been looking at and trying to understand...

Homework Statement


eq0018MP.gif

Taking the transform:

eq0019MP.gif


Just wondering, can someone explain to me why the e-3s/s is positive, and not negative because it is originally -u3(t)...
It's probably just a typo in the original problem.

Another quick one:

Write this in terms of Heaviside function:

f(t) =
{ 0, 0 <= t <= pi
{ -sin3t, t >= pi

1) So you would get f(t) = -(upit)sin3t

And somehow it ends up as f(t) = (upit)sin(3(t-pi))
Can someone explain this step as well? Just what happened to the negative in front of it, and why it became 3(t-pi)
Try expanding sin[3(t-pi)] using the angle addition formula for sine. The reason it was written this way is probably because it's now in the form where the time-shift property of the Laplace transform can be applied.
 

Attachments

  • eq0018MP.gif
    eq0018MP.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 440
  • eq0019MP.gif
    eq0019MP.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 444
Thanks for the first one that makes sense.

For the second one, I attempted using the identity and get:

f(t) = -upi(t)sin(3t)
= -L{upi(t)sin3(t-pi+pi)}
= -L{upi(t)[sin3(t-pi)cos(3pi) + sin(3pi)cos3(t-pi)]}
taking the transform:
= -e-pi*s(3cos(3pi) + 3s*sin(3pi) / s2 + 9

Hmm I don't understand how it is suppose to be just upi(t)sin(3(t-pi)) = e-pi*s(3) / (s2 + 9)(s2 + 1)

What happened when you add the pi and subtract it, and what happened to the negative in front of it all?
 
What are cos(3π) and sin(3π) equal to? Also, I didn't mean that you needed to use the time-shift property to get that result. It's just basic trig.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
965
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K