Laplace's equation when there is a point dipole

Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
A point dipole p is imbedded at the center of a sphere of linear
dielectric material (with radius R and dielectric constant r). Find the electric potential inside and outside the sphere.
Relevant Equations
Laplace's equation
I know the solution already, yet I don't understand why I'm able to solve laplace's equation when the volume has a point dipole within; I thought this required Poisson's eauation, which I have no experience in solving. Here is the relevant part of the solution
Screenshot_2022-07-19-22-19-24-88_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well Poisson's equation, \nabla^2 \phi = \rho, reduces to Laplace's equation ## \nabla^2 \phi = 0 ## at any point where the charge distribution is zero. Since the only charge in your problem iis at the origin, your potential satisfies Laplace's equation everywhere except at ##r=0##, which is what your posted solution is doing. Except your solution is also matching the small-r dependence with the potential of a dipole. You can think of it as treating the dipole as a boundary condition for the potential which satisfies Laplace's equation for ##r>0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Ahmed1029, vanhees71 and Delta2
I think there is an inherent contradiction whenever we use a point dipole in a problem, because we say that the charge density ##\rho=0## everywhere, yet there is net dipole moment ##p\neq 0## where as ##p=\int\rho (\mathbf{r'}) (\mathbf{r-r'})d^3\mathbf{r'}## should be zero. If we say that the charge density isn't zero everywhere then we would have to solve Poisson's equation and not Laplace's equation.
 
Of course, the charge distribution is not ##0## everywhere. It rather has a singularity at the location of the dipole.

It's well worth to consider this in some detail. So let's start from the somewhat simpler problem of point charge, which we put in the origin of our coordinate system. Also there ##\rho(\vec{r})=0## everywhere except at ##\vec{r}=0##, where the charge density must be singular. Formally that's written in terms of the Dirac distribution (where "distribution" here means "generalized function"), i.e.,
$$\rho(\vec{r})=q \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
Now consider a dipole. Intuitively you can think about it as having two charges ##q## and ##-q##. Let's put the negative one at ##\vec{r}=0## and the positive one at some place ##\vec{d}##. Then the charge distribution is
$$\rho(\vec{r}) = q [\delta(\vec{r}-\vec{d})-\delta(\vec{r})]=-q \vec{d} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta(\vec{r}) + \mathcal{O}(q |\vec{d}|^2).$$
Now we consider the limit ##|\vec{d}| \rightarrow 0## such that ##\vec{p} =q \vec{d}=\text{const}##. Then the contributions to higher order vanish, and you get
$$\rho(\vec{r})=-\vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
The electrostatic potential becomes
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 r' \frac{\rho(\vec{r}')}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 |\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} =- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla}' \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}').$$
Integration by parts gives [EDIT: corrected in view of #5]
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=+ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 r' \vec{p} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}') \cdot \vec{\nabla}' \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} =\frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3},$$
i.e., the dipole field.

So you get
$$\Delta \frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3}=-\frac{1}{\epsilon}_0 \rho(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes PhDeezNutz, king vitamin, Delta2 and 1 other person
vanhees71 said:
Of course, the charge distribution is not ##0## everywhere. It rather has a singularity at the location of the dipole.

It's well worth to consider this in some detail. So let's start from the somewhat simpler problem of point charge, which we put in the origin of our coordinate system. Also there ##\rho(\vec{r})=0## everywhere except at ##\vec{r}=0##, where the charge density must be singular. Formally that's written in terms of the Dirac distribution (where "distribution" here means "generalized function"), i.e.,
$$\rho(\vec{r})=q \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
Now consider a dipole. Intuitively you can think about it as having two charges ##q## and ##-q##. Let's put the negative one at ##\vec{r}=0## and the positive one at some place ##\vec{d}##. Then the charge distribution is
$$\rho(\vec{r}) = q [\delta(\vec{r}-\vec{d})-\delta(\vec{r})]=-q \vec{d} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta(\vec{r}) + \mathcal{O}(q |\vec{d}|^2).$$
Now we consider the limit ##|\vec{d}| \rightarrow 0## such that ##\vec{p} =q \vec{d}=\text{const}##. Then the contributions to higher order vanish, and you get
$$\rho(\vec{r})=-\vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
The electrostatic potential becomes
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 r' \frac{\rho(\vec{r}')}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 |\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} =- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla}' \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}').$$
Integration by parts gives
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=+ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 r' \vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla}' \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|} =\frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{|4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3},$$
i.e., the dipole field.

So you get
$$\Delta \frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3}=-\frac{1}{\epsilon}_0 \rho(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).$$
Thanks for saving me 20 minites of typing on the phone! 😁

Edit: Missing a delta distribution in the integral after partial integration though.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, Delta2 and vanhees71
thank you all
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top