LaTeX Latex code for the class SE of short exact sequences in Mod_R

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on achieving the correct LaTeX representation for the symbols S and E in the context of short exact sequences in Mod_R, as presented in Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules." The user attempted to use the command \mathscr{S} \mathscr{E} but found that the S did not match Bland's version. The solution involves using the mt package, which provides the desired embellishment for the S symbol. This insight is crucial for anyone looking to replicate specific typographic styles in mathematical documents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with LaTeX typesetting
  • Understanding of short exact sequences in module theory
  • Knowledge of the mt package for LaTeX
  • Basic concepts of mathematical notation in LaTeX
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mt package for LaTeX and its features
  • Explore advanced LaTeX commands for mathematical symbols
  • Learn about embellishments in LaTeX for improved typographic styles
  • Study short exact sequences in module theory for better context
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, LaTeX users, and students studying module theory who need to accurately represent mathematical symbols in their documents.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I just uploaded a post on the class SE of short exact sequences in Mod_R ... and tried to use Latex Code to achieve the same fancy script for S and E as Paul E Bland used in his text "Rings and Their Modules" ... but seemingly did not achieve the right script for S (E seems OK, or at least close) ... can someone please help with the correct Latex code ...

The relevant text from Bland's text is as follows:View attachment 3624
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3625I tried \mathscr{S} \mathscr{E} for the script SE and got the following:

$$\mathscr{S} \mathscr{E}
$$but as you can see the S does not look quite the same as Bland's for some reason ...

Can someone please help me to achieve the same S as Bland uses?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See this answer on StackExchange. Bland's variant seems to be the first under the heading "Embellished" and is provided by the [m]mt[/m] package.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K