Laurent Series and Partial Fractions: Exam Help Requested

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Laurent series and partial fractions in complex analysis, specifically using the function f(z) = 12/(z(2-z)(1+z). The user references Boas' methodology for deriving partial fractions, resulting in f(z) = (4/z)(1/(1+z) + (1/2-z). The three singular points identified are z = 0, z = 2, and z = -1, leading to the derivation of three distinct Laurent series valid in the regions 0 < |z| < 1, 1 < |z| < 2, and |z| > 2. The user expresses confusion regarding the choice of expansion techniques based on convergence in specific regions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and singularities
  • Familiarity with Laurent series and their applications
  • Knowledge of partial fraction decomposition
  • Basic concepts of convergence in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Laurent series for functions with multiple singularities
  • Learn about the convergence criteria for Laurent series in different regions
  • Explore advanced techniques in partial fraction decomposition
  • Review examples of complex functions and their singular points
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in complex analysis, educators teaching Laurent series and partial fractions, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of convergence in complex functions.

FiberOptix
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I've got an exam tomorrow so any quick responses would be appreciated. I'm following the Boas section on Laurent series... Anyway, here's my problem:

In an example Boas starts with f(z) = 12/(z(2-z)(1+z), and then using partial fractions arrives at f(z) = (4/z)(1/(1+z) + (1/2-z)). Fine. So there are three singular points, at z = 0, z = 2, and z = -1. So, we have two circles about z = 0 and should be able to obtain three Laurent series, one valid for 0 < |z| < 1, 1 < |z| < 2, and |z| > 2. I'll skip the details of the rest of this example but she expands the partial fraction in terms of z to obtain f(z) for 0 < |z| < 1, then proceeds to expand in terms of 1/z to obtain f(z) for |z| > 2 and then one of the partial fractions in terms of z and the other one in terms of 1/z to obtain f(z) for 1 < |z| < 2.

I'm a bit confused as to why z, 1/z, and then a combination and also how you know which will correspond to which solution for f(z).

As I said, the exam is tomorrow so any quick responses would be helpful.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, so I now understand it's because of the convergence in particular regions but I'm still not 100% on this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K