Laurent Series and Singularity Proofs.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving properties of analytic functions with singularities, specifically within the context of Laurent Series. It establishes that if a function f is analytic and injective on an open set D excluding a point a, then a is a non-essential singularity. Additionally, it concludes that if f has a pole at a, it must be of order 1, and if a is a removable singularity, the analytic extension of f remains injective. Key theorems referenced include the Big Picard Theorem and the Little Picard Theorem, which aid in understanding the behavior of f near singularities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, particularly singularities.
  • Familiarity with Laurent Series and their properties.
  • Knowledge of injective functions and their implications in complex analysis.
  • Awareness of the Big Picard Theorem and Little Picard Theorem.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Big Picard Theorem in complex analysis.
  • Learn about the classification of singularities in complex functions.
  • Explore the properties and applications of Laurent Series in analytic functions.
  • Investigate injective functions and their role in complex mappings.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, as well as anyone involved in studying analytic functions and their singularities.

moo5003
Messages
202
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let D be a subset of C and D is open. Suppose a is in D and f:D\{a} -> C is analytic and injective. Prove the following statements:

a) f has in a, a non-essential singularity.
b) If f has a pole in a, then it is a pole of order 1.
c) If f has a removable singularity in a, then theanalytic extension of f to D is one to one too.


Homework Equations


Laurent Series
f(z) = h(1/z) + g(z) on the annulis.
a_n = 0 for all n<k for some k in Z if a is removable
a_n != 0 for infinite n<0 if a is essential


The Attempt at a Solution


a)I'm a little stumped at the moment. I've narrowed my goal down to showing that for some reason because f(z) is one to one that a_n goes to 0. My other guess was to assume that the sing. was essential but I'm not sure how to come up with a contradiction. Any hints you guys can provide would be helpful. :bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For essential singularities, look up the theorem known as "Little Picard". For pole singularities, the function near the pole behaves an awful lot like 1/(z-a)^n. Now remember a complex number has n n-th roots.
 
I think you meant to say use the Big Picard Theorem, but either way thanks for the tip it made the problem much more approachable. (Contradiction to injectivity arises since you can find two dotted disks that both map C or C\{b} for some b in C which implies that points map to the same thing =><= ). Thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K