Law for heat exchange and evaporation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the laws governing heat exchange and the cooling effects produced by evaporation, particularly under isothermal conditions. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mechanisms of heat transfer, and the implications of temperature gradients in the context of evaporation and radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is a specific law for heat exchange, noting that heat exchange occurs due to temperature differences.
  • Others mention Newton's Law of Cooling and Kirchhoff's Law in relation to heat transfer, suggesting that cooling effects due to radiation are distinct from those due to evaporation.
  • One participant emphasizes that evaporation is not a chemical process, while another argues that the phase change from liquid to vapor involves a chemical change due to positive spontaneity.
  • A participant describes the conditions under which a pure liquid evaporates isothermally, highlighting the necessity of heat transfer from the surroundings to maintain isothermal conditions despite a temperature gradient in the surroundings.
  • Another participant discusses the kinetic energy distribution of molecules in the evaporating liquid, explaining how surface molecules with higher kinetic energy can escape, leading to a cooling effect on the remaining liquid.
  • Concerns are raised about how molecules with higher kinetic energy can absorb energy and the definition of temperature in relation to different layers of liquid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of evaporation, the role of temperature gradients, and the classification of evaporation as a chemical process. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of heat transfer mechanisms and the assumptions involved in defining temperature and energy exchange in the context of evaporation.

rkatcosmos
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I wonder if there is any law for heat exchange. I have learned that heat exchange between systems occurs when the temperature of respective systems differ. But in case of evaporation, the process creates a cooling effect even in an isothermal condition ( I mean by isothermal condition to be a isothermal situation between the evaporating liquid and the surrounding).

I would like to discuss the cooling effects produced by evaporation under isothermal condition.
 
Science news on Phys.org
If heating is by radiation, it can only take place at temperature difference. Newtons Law of cooling states that. There are other laws like Kirchoff's Law(search Wiki).

Cooling effects due to radiation is a different process. Exchange of material takes place between System and surrounding. Though i don't know too much details about it. But basically it is a chemical process that happens because change in Entropy(delta S) is positive.
 
darkxponent said:
If heating is by radiation, it can only take place at temperature difference. Newtons Law of cooling states that. There are other laws like Kirchoff's Law(search Wiki).

Cooling effects due to radiation is a different process. Exchange of material takes place between System and surrounding. Though i don't know too much details about it. But basically it is a chemical process that happens because change in Entropy(delta S) is positive.

I was asking about evaporation and not radiation.
And in both cases I don't think its a chemical process
 
rkatcosmos said:
I was asking about evaporation and not radiation.

Really? See what you wrote in Post1.
rkatcosmos said:
I wonder if there is any law for heat exchange. I have learned that heat exchange between systems occurs when the temperature of respective systems differ.
This was what what i replied to.
rkatcosmos said:
And in both cases I don't think its a chemical process
Case two is definitely a chemical change where,

H20(liquid) → H20(vapour), which in this case happens because spontaneity is positive as liquid changes into gas.
 
When a pure liquid system is evaporating under isothermal conditions (at constant pressure), a part of its boundary is receiving heat from the surroundings. But how can this be if the situation is isothermal? For the system to remain isothermal, the rate of heat transfer from the surroundings to the system must equal the rate of evaporation times the latent heat of evaporation. Even if the system is isothermal, the portion of the surroundings through which heat flow is occurring is not isothermal spatially. There is a temperature gradient within the surroundings that is responsible for conductive heat flow to the system. The interface between the system and the surroundings is at the evaporation temperature of the system, but, within the surroundings, the temperature increases with distance from the boundary. The thermal conductivity of the surroundings times the surroundings' temperature gradient at the interface is equal to the heat flux (heat flow per unit area) into the system.
 
Initially assuming the liquid and the surroundings are at the same temperature,let us proceed.
First let us consider the evaporating liquid which is the object of interest ,not the surroundings.
When you say a substance is at a constant temperature,the average KE of the molecules is a constant,in this case for the evaporating liquid.Though,we say the evaporating liquid is at a constant temperature,you will always find molecules having KE greater than and lesser than the average KE. Also,we know that Evaporation is a surface phenomenon.Therefore,molecules only at the surface can evaporate,so those molecules which have KE greater than say a "critical KE" will escape into the air.The Surface molecules tend to absorb KE from non-surface molecules which have KE greater than avg. KE and also itself. Once, the surface molecule escapes into the air(or whatever),the remaining liquid is left with a lesser average KE ,which implies a lesser temperature(however small say dT).Therefore ,the evaporating liquid absorbs an elemental energy(dE) from the surroundings for every molecule evaporating.Therefore responsible for cooling effect on the surroundings.

The catch:
If you ask how can there be non-surface molecules which have KE greater than surface molecules,(owing to surface energy...)I would say on an average surface molecules may have higher energy,but still it is an average, in a distribution you will always find "some" non-surface molecules with higher KE than surface molecules
 
Hummel said:
Initially assuming the liquid and the surroundings are at the same temperature,let us proceed.
First let us consider the evaporating liquid which is the object of interest ,not the surroundings.
When you say a substance is at a constant temperature,the average KE of the molecules is a constant,in this case for the evaporating liquid.Though,we say the evaporating liquid is at a constant temperature,you will always find molecules having KE greater than and lesser than the average KE. Also,we know that Evaporation is a surface phenomenon.Therefore,molecules only at the surface can evaporate,so those molecules which have KE greater than say a "critical KE" will escape into the air.The Surface molecules tend to absorb KE from non-surface molecules which have KE greater than avg. KE and also itself. Once, the surface molecule escapes into the air(or whatever),the remaining liquid is left with a lesser average KE ,which implies a lesser temperature(however small say dT).Therefore ,the evaporating liquid absorbs an elemental energy(dE) from the surroundings for every molecule evaporating.Therefore responsible for cooling effect on the surroundings.

The catch:
If you ask how can there be non-surface molecules which have KE greater than surface molecules,(owing to surface energy...)I would say on an average surface molecules may have higher energy,but still it is an average, in a distribution you will always find "some" non-surface molecules with higher KE than surface molecules

If particles with KE greater greater than "critical KE" escapes, then how do they absorb energy? Why should they absorb energy? They are already having higher energy...

And can temperature be defined to any defined region? If so what will be the definition of temperature?
If average KE of the system is defined as temperature, then is there flow of heat between different layers of liquid(as you say average KE at the top layer is higher than the bottom layer of liquid)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K