Is the Law of Conservation of Energy Valid in a Non-Local Context?

AI Thread Summary
The law of conservation of energy is universally accepted in Newtonian mechanics and special relativity, where energy is conserved both locally and globally. However, in general relativity, energy conservation is complex; it is conserved locally but not globally due to the absence of a fixed global concept of simultaneity. This lack of simultaneity complicates the assertion that total energy remains constant over time. Consequently, the validity of the law of conservation of energy in a non-local context is not straightforward. Overall, while local conservation holds, global conservation presents significant challenges in the framework of general relativity.
Kyle Nemeth
Messages
25
Reaction score
2
Is it accepted that the law of conservation of energy can be considered in a non-local context? If this is not accepted, then why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyle Nemeth said:
Is it accepted that the law of conservation of energy can be considered in a non-local context? If this is not accepted, then why not?
In the context of Newtonian mechanics, energy is strictly and globally conserved.
In the context of special relativity, energy is strictly and globally conserved.

In the context of general relativity, energy is conserved locally but global energy conservation is not simple. One way of seeing this is to realize that there is no fixed global concept of simultaneity. So there is no fixed meaning to an assertion that total energy "now" is the same as total energy "a moment ago".
 
  • Like
Likes Kyle Nemeth
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top