Laws of Multi-Terminal Components

In summary, the conversation discusses how Kirchhoff's voltage and current laws, as well as Ohm's law, apply to multi-terminal elements such as transistors. It is explained that these laws still hold but may require certain considerations and the use of 2-port network theory. The conversation also mentions the use of nodal analysis and the simplification of circuits using linear models for transistors. It is concluded that while Ohm's law may not directly apply, the concept of resistance can still be used to analyze multi-terminal components.
  • #1
amonraa
17
0
Hi all,

I know about Kirchhoff's voltage and current laws when it comes to simple circuits with two-terminal elements and junctions/nodes of branches. However I'm curious how KVL and KCL are applicable to multi-terminal elements? Does KCL apply to any junction of branches no matter what that junction is, an element/black box/IC/simple node? How does KVL apply to loops with multi-terminal elements?
Does Ohm's law or element law hold true for multi-terminal elements? For instance a transistor in simple common emitter configuration, if we apply KVL to the collector-emitter loop to calculate the Vce (voltage between collector and emitter) can we dvide this voltage by the resistance measured between the collector-emitter terminals to find the current? And if so which current would this be, the collector currant or the emitter?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
As I expected, KVL, KCL, and Ohm's Law don't apply nicely to multi-terminal components, we need to convert the circuit to a form of multi-port network with some restrictions.

Thanks! :-)
 
  • #4
All fundamentals laws holds in multi-terminal components as well as in common emitter.
 
  • #5
I doubt it...after reading about the transistor circuits and 2-port network. True they hold but under certain considerations. So what I concluded it's not as easy as you would treat a two-terminal element.
 
  • #6
Well you simply don't understand why we use and why we "created" 2-port network theory and small-signal models.
We simply replace a transistor with his small-signal representation the model. And next we use KVC and KCL and ohms law to analysis this small signal model. But the basic laws always hold. And we use this small-signal model to simplify our calculations (we can use algebra only) we don't need to use a non-linear equation.

See this example of a common emitter amplifier.
attachment.php?attachmentid=60647&stc=1&d=1375455185.png

At first we bias the transistor in linear active region.
Next we connect the input signal 2V peak to peak AC signal.
The DC voltage at base is equal Vb=2.6V, and emitter dc-voltage is 2V.
So if we apply the ac signal to the base. The dc-voltage will be change from 2.6V + 1V = 3.6V and 2.6V - 1V = 1.6V. So the base voltage will change from 3.6V to 1.6V in "rhythm" of a ac input signal.
These changes will result that the emitter voltage will also change. From 3V to 1V. This will result the change in emitter and in collector current by (3V) 0.9mA to 0.3mA (1V). And this change in collector current will cause change in VRc voltage, between 9V to 3V. We have a three times larger change in VRc voltage because Rc is three times larger then Re resistor.

And as you can see I can use a Ohm's law to find all the current in this circuit.
And for any circuit we can use this basic law of electricity to find all what we need.
 

Attachments

  • 43.PNG
    43.PNG
    9 KB · Views: 2,160
Last edited:
  • #7
You are right but I mean the 2-port network is to model a complex device (multi-terminal which is not a multi-port network we modeled) into an equivalent circuit that uses 2-terminal components so that we can use these laws consistently.
 
  • #8
Can you give me a example of a "Multi-Terminal Components" or circuit? Because I am very curious why you think that these basic law of electricity don't "work" in "Multi-Terminal Components".

I give you another example. I will use nodal analysis which is nothing more than a KCL.

attachment.php?attachmentid=60648&stc=1&d=1375460997.png


So for the Vc node we can write

IR3 = IR1 + Ib2 + Ic1

(Vcc - Vc)/R3 = (Vc - Vb1)/R1 + Ic1 + Ib2

Now KCL for Vb1 node

IR1 = IR2 + Ib

(Vc - Vb1)/R1 = Vb1/R2 + Ib1

And finally KCL for Ve1 node.

IR4 = Ie1 - Ib3

Ve1/R4 = Ie1 - Ib3

And additional equation for BJT

attachment.php?attachmentid=60649&stc=1&d=1375461518.png


And next we need to use some numerical methods to solve the nonlinear equations.
I use a Mathematica software.
attachment.php?attachmentid=60650&stc=1&d=1375461741.png


To be able to use algebra we are force to use some simplification and replace the BJT with his linear model.
 

Attachments

  • 27.png
    27.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 412
  • 77.png
    77.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 414
  • 12.PNG
    12.PNG
    26.8 KB · Views: 441
  • #9
For example If we assume Vbe = 0.65V and we ignore the transistors base current. We can solve for Vc quite easily. Just by assuming the Vbe voltage we already know the IR2, IR4 currents and Vb1 voltage.
attachment.php?attachmentid=60651&stc=1&d=1375462567.png


IR4 = Vbe/R4

IR2 = Vb1/R2 = 2Vbe/R2

And we can find Vc voltage

Vc = IR2*R2 + IR1*R1 = 2Vbe + (2Vbe/R2) * R1 = 2Vbe + 2Vbe * R1/R2 = 2Vbe* (1+R1/R2)

and Vout = Vc - Vbe
 

Attachments

  • 158.png
    158.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 420
  • #10
Measure the voltage between a C and E of a common-emitter npn transistor, can you divide this voltage by the impedance between the C and E to obtain current? which current?
 
  • #11
amonraa said:
Measure the voltage between a C and E of a common-emitter npn transistor, can you divide this voltage by the impedance between the C and E to obtain current? which current?
But we don't need to know collector-emitter impedance to obtain Ic current. Do you know that collector-emitter "junction" behaves just like a constant current source? So how can we obtain impedance of a current source?
Try to read this
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4459025#post4459025
 
  • #12
Yeah I know I'm not trying to obtain the collector current, I just want to know what current that would be obtained from V[ce]/R[ce] if this even valid...you see my point where Ohm's law is not clearly applicable in this situation...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
But your example don't prove anything. This has nothing to do with the Ohm's law.
If transistor is in active region collector behaves as a constant current source independent of the collector voltage. So how can we speak about resistance of a current source?
We can only talk about static resistance , for a give Ic current and Vce voltage we can find static Rce resistance.
Rce = Vce/Ic or if we are dealing with the AC signals we can find dynamic resistance rce = ΔVce/ΔIc
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #14
You are clearly missing the point. I = V/R, this is not applicable to any of transistor terminal pairs.
 
  • #15
Are you try to say that we cannot use this definition rce = ΔVce/ΔIc for a BJT working in a active region to find small-signal collector-emitter resistance?
 
  • #16
Exactly...but maybe I'm wrong I forgot a transistor it's an active element so we cannot apply Ohm's law.
Put it another way, three-terminal element there's no one current, since it's a junction not one branch.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
You are wrong, we use rce = ΔVce/ΔIc quite often and this dynamic output resistance from collector to emitter, represents the collector current source (control via base current) internal resistance. And also we can even measure it on the benchtop.
Also don't forget that KCL work for transistor. The emitter current is the sum of the base and collector current.
Ie = Ib + Ic.
 
  • #18
KCL and KVL yes, but not clear how to apply Ohm's law. I think your formula is an approximation for testing purposes or there's something inaccurate about it...never heard of R[ce], this is probably an approximation like the one I[c] ~= I[e] then we can talk about a current through an imaginary resistor "R[ce]" Try Ohms law on a 1000 pins IC and let me know what you find ;-)
 

Related to Laws of Multi-Terminal Components

1. What are the "Laws of Multi-Terminal Components"?

The Laws of Multi-Terminal Components are a set of principles that govern the behavior and relationships between multiple electronic components in a circuit. They describe how voltage, current, and resistance are affected when multiple components are connected in series or parallel.

2. How do the Laws of Multi-Terminal Components affect circuit analysis?

The Laws of Multi-Terminal Components are essential for understanding and analyzing complex circuits. They provide a systematic approach to solving circuit problems and can help in predicting the behavior of a circuit based on the values of its components.

3. What are the main types of multi-terminal components?

The main types of multi-terminal components are resistors, capacitors, and inductors. These components have multiple terminals that are used to connect them in different configurations to create a circuit.

4. What is the difference between series and parallel connections in multi-terminal components?

In a series connection, the components are connected end-to-end, and the same current flows through each component. In a parallel connection, the components are connected side-by-side, and the same voltage is applied across each component. The total resistance in a series connection is equal to the sum of individual resistances, while in a parallel connection, it is less than the smallest individual resistance.

5. How do the Laws of Multi-Terminal Components apply to practical circuits?

The Laws of Multi-Terminal Components are fundamental to the design and functioning of practical circuits. They are used to calculate the values of components needed to achieve a desired result, such as a specific voltage or current, and to troubleshoot issues in a circuit. Understanding these laws is crucial for engineers and scientists working with electronic circuits.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
854
Replies
2
Views
778
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
893
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top