LC circuit -- Calculate the work done

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done in an oscillating LC circuit when the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor are separated, increasing the oscillation frequency by a factor of η. The work done, ΔW, is derived using the formula ΔW = W · (η - 1), where W represents the initial energy stored in the capacitor. Key equations include the capacitance formulas C = (ε₀ · S) / d and C' = (ε₀ · S) / (η² · d). The average force exerted during the separation is calculated as F = (q_m²) / (4ε₀S), leading to the conclusion that the initial charge q_m is not conserved during this process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LC circuits and oscillation principles
  • Familiarity with capacitor equations, specifically C = (ε₀ · S) / d
  • Knowledge of electrostatic force calculations
  • Basic integration techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy stored in capacitors and inductors
  • Learn about the implications of charge conservation in oscillating circuits
  • Explore the effects of varying capacitance on oscillation frequency in LC circuits
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques for solving logarithmic terms in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists studying circuit dynamics, and anyone interested in the principles of oscillating circuits and energy calculations.

RingNebula57
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
In an oscillating circuit consisting of of a parallel-plate capacitor and an inductance coil with negligible active resistance the oscillations with energy ##W## are sustained. The capacitor plates were slowly drawn apart to increase the scillation frequency ##\eta##-fold. What work was done in the process?

Homework Equations


##C = \frac{\epsilon_0 \cdot S}{d}##
##C'=\frac{\epsilon_0 \cdot S}{\eta^2 d} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


So ohm's law is written like this: (before the stretching of the capacitor)

##L \cdot \ddot{q} = -\frac{q}{C}##
This implies:
##\omega^2=\frac{1}{LC}##
##q_{(t)}=q_m \cdot sin(\omega t)##

The electrostatic force exerted by one plate on the other is:

## F = E_{(t)} \cdot q_{(t)} ##
## E_{(t)} = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} = \frac{q_{(t)}}{2\epsilon_0S} ## ##\Bigg\} ## ##F = \frac{q_{(t)}^2}{2\epsilon_0S}=\frac{q_m^2 \cdot sin(\omega t)^2}{2\epsilon_0S}##

Because the streching of the capacitor happened slowly it means that we can consider the average force over one period:

##\bar{F}=\frac{q_m^2}{4\epsilon_0S}##
So , the work done is then:
## \Delta W= \bar{F}\cdot d\cdot (\eta^2-1) = \frac{q_m^2d}{4\epsilon_0S} \cdot (\eta^2-1)##

Now,
##W=\frac{q_m^2}{2C}=\frac{q_m^2d}{2\epsilon_0S}##

From here results that :
##\Delta W= \frac{W}{2} \cdot (\eta^2-1)##

This formula implies that the initial charge ##q_m## is not conserved. Is it ok? It looked odd to me...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
RingNebula57 said:
##\bar{F}=\frac{q_m^2}{4\epsilon_0S}##
I believe this is correct.

So , the work done is then:
## \Delta W= \bar{F}\cdot d\cdot (\eta^2-1) = \frac{q_m^2d}{4\epsilon_0S} \cdot (\eta^2-1)##
This assumes that ##\bar{F}## remains constant while the plates are separated. But as you found, ##q_m## is not conserved. So, the average force is not constant.

Now,
##W=\frac{q_m^2}{2C}=\frac{q_m^2d}{2\epsilon_0S}##
Yes

For notational convenience, I suggest letting ##x## stand for the distance between the plates. Consider the work done by the average applied force for an infinitesimal increase in separation, ##dx##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RingNebula57
TSny said:
I believe this is correct.

This assumes that ##\bar{F}## remains constant while the plates are separated. But as you found, ##q_m## is not conserved. So, the average force is not constant.

Yes

For notational convenience, I suggest letting ##x## stand for the distance between the plates. Consider the work done by the average applied force for an infinitesimal increase in separation, ##dx##.
Thank you!

I solved it. Obtaining that :

##\Delta W = W \cdot (\eta-1)##
 
RingNebula57 said:
I solved it. Obtaining that :

##\Delta W = W \cdot (\eta-1)##
Looks good!
 
RingNebula57 said:
Thank you!

I solved it. Obtaining that :

##\Delta W = W \cdot (\eta-1)##
Please help me with the solution...as I am g
etting a logarithmic term while integration of 1/x
 
Anubhav said:
Please help me with the solution...as I am g
etting a logarithmic term while integration of 1/x
Please start a new thread with your question. This thread here is 5 years old. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
937