MHB LCM of 22x32x4 and 23x3: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasadini
  • Start date Start date
prasadini
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The Lowest Common Multiple of 22x32x4 and 23x3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have any ideas on how this problem may be approached?
 
greg1313 said:
Do you have any ideas on how this problem may be approached?

There is 2 answer
(a) 144 (e) 24 𝑋 32 How can i get this answer
 
prasadini said:
There is 2 answer
(a) 144 (e) 24 𝑋 32 How can i get this answer

Sorry for dumb question, but how is 144 a multiple of 22x32x4? isn't 144<22x32x4??
 
prasadini said:
There is 2 answer
(a) 144 (e) 24 𝑋 32 How can i get this answer

You need to start showing you have at least thought about the problem before posting.
 
prasadini said:
The Lowest Common Multiple of 22x32x4 and 23x3

I would begin by writing the prime factorizations of both numbers:

$$22\cdot32\cdot4=(2\cdot11)(2^5)(2^2)=2^8\cdot11$$

$$23\cdot3=3\cdot23$$

Now, combine the prime factors from both, using the higher power of each prime factor found in either, to get the LCM, which we'll call $N$:

$$N=2^8\cdot3\cdot11\cdot23=194304$$

Since the two given numbers are co-prime, we find their LCM to simply be their product. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top