Learn Analysis: Math Skills & Textbook Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callmejoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
To begin learning mathematical analysis, a solid foundation in calculus is essential, which includes a year of differential calculus and some exposure to integral and multivariable calculus. While formal proof techniques are beneficial, they are not strictly necessary if one has a strong grasp of calculus concepts. Spivak's textbook is highly recommended as a bridge from calculus to analysis, as it effectively introduces proof techniques. Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" is considered a good resource for those ready for a more rigorous approach, but it may not be suitable for beginners unfamiliar with proofs. Linear algebra is not a prerequisite for learning analysis. For self-learners, starting with Spivak, followed by either Rudin or Terry Tao's freely available analysis notes, is a suggested pathway.
Callmejoe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello, I would like to start learning mathematical analysis. I have a basic year of calc( on course in differential, one integral) and a course in multivariable calculus. Will I be able to learn analysis or do I need to learn formal proofs of some sort? Is linear algebra necessary? Also any recommendations on a starting textbook, bonus points if its good for self learning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Spivak to bridge the gap between introductory calculus and introductory analysis. Rudin is good if you're just looking for straightforward analysis, but I wouldn't recommend it if you haven't been exposed to proofs yet. Linear algebra isn't necessary.

My recommendation would be Spivak, then perhaps Rudin, or go through an intro to proofs book, then either Rudin, or Terry Tao's (freely available) analysis notes.
 
So you would say Spivak calculus -> proofs(optional) ->Rudin.
 
If you can get through Spivak, you'll sure know your proofs well enough for Rudin.
 
Yes, if you can make it through Spivak adequately, then you won't need a proofs book (though it would never hurt).
 
Thanks for the information, wish me luck!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top