Studying Learn Basic Plasma Physics: What Else Do I Need?

AI Thread Summary
To learn basic plasma physics, a solid foundation in classical physics and mathematics is essential. Key areas of study include classical electrodynamics, with recommendations to study Feynman's lectures and undergraduate texts like Marion or Corson. A strong grasp of vector calculus, differential equations, and elementary linear algebra is also important. Familiarity with Fourier transforms and linear response theory will enhance understanding, particularly for wave phenomena in plasma. While Chen's book is suggested as a starting point, prior knowledge of electrodynamics at Griffiths' level and basic kinetic theory is beneficial. Fluid dynamics knowledge can be helpful but is not strictly necessary. Engaging with these subjects will prepare learners for the diverse and complex field of plasma physics.
Vardaan Bhat
Messages
79
Reaction score
2
I have a goal of learning basic plasma physics (perhaps from a book like Chen's?). Aside from finishing basic physics, what do I need to learn in order to learn plasma physics?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vardaan Bhat said:
I have a goal of learning basic plasma physics (perhaps from a book like Chen's?). Aside from finishing basic physics, what do I need to learn in order to learn plasma physics?

Thanks!
One thing that is used a lot in plasma physics is the Fourier transform of the dielectric response function ## \tilde{\epsilon}(k,\omega) ##. Comes from ## D(x,t)=\int \epsilon (r-r',t-t') E(x',t') d^3x' dt' ## along with Fourier transforms ## \tilde{D}(k,\omega)=\tilde{\epsilon} (k,\omega)\cdot \tilde{E}(k,\omega) ## by use of the Fourier transform convolution theorem in 3 spatial dimensions plus the time domain. (Se e.g. Plasma Physics by Ichimaru if it is still in print). I would recommend getting a good handle on Fourier transform theory along with linear response theory in one dimension (of the continuous variety) i.e. ## \tilde{F}(\omega)=\int F(t) exp^{-i \omega t} dt ##. Also it is helpful to have a strong background in vector calculus and electromagnetic theory.
 
Last edited:
Vardaan Bhat said:
I have a goal of learning basic plasma physics (perhaps from a book like Chen's?). Aside from finishing basic physics, what do I need to learn in order to learn plasma physics?

Thanks!

Finish basic physics and basic math.
 
It would seem imperative to know a fair amount of classical electrodynamics to gain a meaningful understanding of plasma theory. I recommend that you study the heck out of Feynman's second volume and perhaps a good undergrad E&M book like Marion or Corson and Lorraine (probably both are out of print by now). Plasma physics is an incredibly broad subject: it includes resistive and non-resistive magnetohydrodynamics, solid-state plasmas, dilute plasmas best treated by kinetic theory, wave propagation in the ionosphere, ...

You should have an idea of which area is of greatest interest you before diving in too deeply. I took my first course in plasma dynamics concurrently with quantum theory and general relativity as a senior in college-- not sure I would have been ready before then.
Will
 
  • Like
Likes Ameera
You should do some studying in Griffiths electrododynamics and some basic fluid mechanics (navier stokes) before going into Chen. Chen is the best place to start in plasmas.
 
I agree that Chen's book is a good place to start. In order to understand most of the book, you primarily need to know electrodynamics as the level of Griffiths (and you can skip special relativity if you wish). It also helps if you know elementary kinetic theory as can be found in basic "modern physics" books (Tippler, for example). Knowing fluid dynamics first isn't necessary, but wouldn't hurt.

For the math, vector calculus, differential equations and elementary linear algebra will allow you to understand most of Chen. Being comfortable with Fourier analysis would make the waves chapter easier to interpret, but you can get a basic understanding withouta lot of knowledge. Contour integration is used some in chapter 7, but you can get a basic understanding of elementary plasma plasma physics without it.

While Charles Link is correct in general, you can learn a lot of physics from Chen without really learning linear response formalism. If i were you i would just dive into Chen right after griffiths. Also, i don't recommend any of Ichimaru's books for an introduction of any aspect of plasma physics for a beginner. My kinetic theory class was loosely based on volume 1 of "statistical plasma physics", which is no good for a beginner; the earlier version of that book, titled "Basic principles of plasma physics" is much better, but still not a good introduction to the field; "plasma physics: ..." is mostly a collection of topics chapters that cover some advanced topics very early...

I hope you enjoy the journey.

Jason
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top