Learning curve of EM? (Not homework)

  • Thread starter Thread starter martinlematre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Em Homework
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of understanding electromagnetism (EM) in a first-year physics course, particularly in the context of students who may not have a strong foundation in calculus or prior exposure to the subject.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express concerns about the difficulty of EM compared to other first-year physics topics, questioning whether a lack of calculus knowledge will hinder their understanding. There is a discussion about the conceptual nature of EM and its visualization challenges.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their perspectives on the complexity of EM, noting its importance in the physics curriculum. There is recognition of the varying levels of difficulty among different topics, but no consensus has been reached regarding the overall challenge of EM.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions that their introductory course is not calculus-based, which may influence the discussion on the perceived difficulty of EM.

martinlematre
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I'm taking a first year physics course and have been having a little trouble with the basics of Newtons laws and forces and whatnot, though nothing that can't be fixed with a bit more hard work.

I'm looking ahead now and seeing a lot of EM material, and after kind of taking a brief look at the homework, contents and whatnot I must say it seems quite unfamiliar.

Do you find first year EM with no calculus to be a lot harder than the rest of first year content? I am just wondering if I'm going to have some trouble with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is EM?
 
I'm guessing electromagnetism.
Personally I think it is one of the trickiest parts of the curriculum, because it doesn't only require good calculus skills but also a thorough understanding of the concepts and thought; more, in my opinion, than many other subjects. However it is one of the most important parts of physics, and I dare even say the most important one. Learning it and learning it well will be rewarding and very useful for any physicist (in fact everyone should probably have a basic understanding of it).
 
I would agree with CompuChip. In much of physics, you can see the physics in action, i.e. masses falling, balls interacting, the effects of light, and etc. In EM you don't see much. It is a thought process and more difficult to visualize.
 
Our intro is not calculus based
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
133K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
570
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K