Learning Non-Axiomatic Logics: Pei Wang

  • Thread starter Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know a good source for learning about non-axiomatic logics?
I found just one name Pei Wang.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EvLer said:
Does anybody know a good source for learning about non-axiomatic logics?
I found just one name Pei Wang.
Thanks in advance.
The scientific method is the best example of a non-axiomatic logic I can think of.
 
I have no idea what a non-axiomatic logic is, but in trying to find out, googling 'non-axiomatic reasoning system' gives better results.
 
honestrosewater said:
I have no idea what a non-axiomatic logic is, but in trying to find out, googling 'non-axiomatic reasoning system' gives better results.
Yeah, that's what I found too: basically work by one person named Pei Wang. I guess one difference between axiomatic and non-axiomatic as described by him is that axiomatic systems assume knowledge provided through premises to be sufficient, while non-axiomatic systems take insufficiency of knowledge as the ground fact, they learn and adapt. A better paper by him that I found (if anybody is interested) is Cognitive Logic versus Mathematical logic.
 
I only glanced at the pages. It seemed to be something about artificial intelligence. Did you read enough to see if or how it's different from plain ol' inductive reasoning?
 
citeseer has a paper,
http://citeseer.csail.mit.edu/wang95nonaxiomatic.html

-- AI
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok its a 181 page paper, i think i will reserve my comments until i can finish reading it up.

-- AI
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top