Least squares estimation with quadratic constraints (M*M = 0)

Michael02
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

currently I am trying to solve a least squares problem of the following form:

min_{M} ||Y - M*X||^2

where M is a 3x3 matrix and Y and X are 3xN matrices. However, the matrix M is of a special form. It is a rank 1 matrix which satisfies M*M = 0_{3x3} and the trace of M is zero, too.

Enforcing that the trace is zero seems rather easy, since it is a linear constraint. But I have no idea how to enforce M*M = 0_{3x3}, as it includes multiple quadratic constraints.

Does anyone have an idea how to solve this problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If ##M## is nilpotent of degree ##2## and of rank ##1##, then there should be a basis, in which ##M## takes the form ##M=E_{13}##, i.e. a ##1## at position ##(1,3)## and ##0## elsewhere.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top