Least Studied Field of Mathematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Mathematics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the least studied or least popular fields of mathematics, particularly those that are relatively unknown or in their infancy. Participants also touch on the most popular fields, with a focus on various mathematical theories and their applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions which field of mathematics is currently the least popular, distinguishing it from established fields like Euclidean geometry.
  • Another participant suggests that algebraic topology may be a promising field for the future.
  • There is a challenge to the assertion about algebraic topology, asking for clarification on why it is considered the future.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about identifying lesser-known fields, noting the difficulty in determining what is truly unknown.
  • Catastrophe theory and category theory are proposed as relatively new theories from the past 50 years, with questions about their status as distinct branches of mathematics.
  • Quantum information is mentioned as a field that will require significant mathematical development and interdisciplinary knowledge.
  • One participant expresses a strong negative opinion about category theory, suggesting it is not valuable.
  • Another participant provides a brief explanation of catastrophe theory, linking it to nonlinear dynamical systems and discussing bifurcations in differential equations.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of comparing graduate mathematics courses, with a participant noting that all graduate topics are challenging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the least studied fields, with no consensus on which field is the least popular or most promising. There are competing views on the value and relevance of category theory and catastrophe theory, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding their status in the mathematical community.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the challenge of defining what constitutes a "new" or "unknown" field, and there are references to the complexity of graduate-level mathematics courses, indicating a lack of clarity on how to compare them.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
What field of mathematics is presently the least popular? I'm not talking fields like Euclidean geometry that's 'old and complete', but of fields that are unknown or in its infancy.

Also what about the MOST popular? Number theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Algebraic topology is the future, me thinks.
 
Why do you think that, might I inquire?
 
Dragonfall said:
but of fields that are unknown

That is somewhat difficult to know, isn't it?
 
arildno said:
That is somewhat difficult to know, isn't it?
good one.
lol
 
i would think something like catastrophe theory and category theory to be the new theories in the past 50 or so years, but is it new enough for you?
 
arildno said:
That is somewhat difficult to know, isn't it?

Relatively unknown. Like this "catastrophe theory" posted above.
 
What is it by the way? How does "catastrophe theory" stands as a branch of math in its own right?
 
Quantum Information. A lot of mathematics will go in there; it also requires concrete knowledge from physics, engineering, and chemistry.
 
  • #10
Catergory theory is a piece of crap...
 
  • #11
quasar, as it's relatively new i myself don't exactly no more than is being described in the web. (such as wikipedia, etc).
but as far as i can tell it's included in applied maths, more specifically to dynamical systems.
 
  • #12
SeReNiTy said:
Catergory theory is a piece of crap...
this is why it's being implemented in cs and physics, they need this sort of crap from mathematicians. (-:
 
  • #13
loop quantum gravity said:
this is why it's being implemented in cs and physics, they need this sort of crap from mathematicians. (-:
And, ironically given SeReNiTy's tastes, the algebraic topologists need it too. (That's why they invented it!)
 
  • #14
SeReNiTy said:
Algebraic topology is the future, me thinks.

I heard algebraic topology was also one of the hardest grad maths courses around. Is that true?
 
  • #15
ILEW said:
I heard algebraic topology was also one of the hardest grad maths courses around. Is that true?
i think that every topic being covered in grad (short for gradient, lol) school is tough, btw how do you want someone to compare courses if as it's not humanly possible to cover all the mathematics courses which are offered by the school. (it's possible but you won't have time to research and specialise in a specific field).
 
  • #16
What is it by the way? How does "catastrophe theory" stands as a branch of math in its own right?

Consider the following differential equation:

x'(t) = r - x(t)^2

If r is negative the every solution has x \rightarrow \infty as t\rightarrow \infty, if r = 0 then x = 0 is a semi stable fixed point, and if r > 0 there are unstable and stable fixed points at x = + and - r respectively.

These changes in the qualitative features of solutions as we vary the parameter r are called bifurcations. When there is more than one parameter, the changes can happen in interesting ways, and this is the subject of catastrophe theory.

Not only is catastrophe theory entirely dead, but it has always been part of the "Nonlinear Dynamical Systems" branch.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K