Lenard Jones Potential & wavenumber

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dispersion relation for a Lennard-Jones potential in a monatomic crystalline solid, specifically regarding the wavenumber's potential negative values. It is noted that while the wave vector can be negative, indicating directionality in wave propagation, the wavenumber itself is typically considered positive. Negative wavenumbers are primarily relevant in specific contexts, such as left-handed materials or in Fourier analysis, where they represent complex conjugates of positive frequencies. The group velocity derived from the dispersion relation remains consistent regardless of the sign of the wavenumber. Overall, while negative wavenumbers can have physical meaning in certain scenarios, they are generally not the norm in standard applications.
ian2012
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering, given that you have the dispersion relation omega = omega(k) for a Lenard-Jones potential in say a monatomic crystalline solid of lattice spacing a, which is proportional to sin(ka/2) where k is the wavenumber. The group velocity is the derivative of the dispersion relation with respect to k.
My Question is: Can the wavenumber take negative values in general? (Would it be physically meaningful?). I am thinking it would be okay, as the group velocity would have the same values as if k>0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Typically no, with a few exceptions. We generally deal with the wave number in terms of the wave vector. The wave vector can certainly be negative as it is indicative of the direction of the phase and group propagation. However, the negative sign is part of the directional vector and not of the wave number. The only time that you should have a negative wave number is with a left-handed material as the wave number is defined as

k = \omega\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}

Still, there are times where we do talk about negative frequencies (which would give us negative k) when we are doing a Fourier analysis. These negative frequencies are generally just the complex conjugate of the positive frequency parts and so you can usually fold over the Fourier domain so that you deal only with frequencies greater or equal to zero.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top