Length Contraction & Relativistic Aberration: Is 1 Formula Enough?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Kevin Willis
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
I have been coding a speed of light simulator and I am having a bit of trouble with a few aspects of the project. My first question is:

Are the length contraction and relativistic aberration formulas BOTH needed in my calculations or does the relativistic aberration formula already account for the length contraction?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to clarify what you are trying to calculate. The aberration formula is a self contained consequence of the Lorentz transform for angles of 'light rays'. If all you are interested is computing an image in one frame given that in another, this is all you need.
 
Kevin Willis said:
I have been coding a speed of light simulator and I am having a bit of trouble with a few aspects of the project. My first question is:

Are the length contraction and relativistic aberration formulas BOTH needed in my calculations or does the relativistic aberration formula already account for the length contraction?​
The effect of length contraction is of course included in the relativistic aberration formula. Nevertheless, as PAllen said, it may be useful to specify what case you simulate.