Leonhard Euler's 4-Squares Identity & Maxwell's Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Edgar53
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The 4-Squares-Identity of Leonhard Euler
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_four-square_identity) :

upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg

upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg

upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg

upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg

upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg


has the numeric structure of Maxwell’s equations in 4-space:
upload_2017-11-19_23-5-23.png

upload_2017-11-19_23-7-31.png

upload_2017-11-19_23-6-41.png

Is somebody aware of litterature about this?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    2.4 KB · Views: 882
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 905
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    1.6 KB · Views: 955
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 435
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    upload_2017-11-19_23-4-30.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 507
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-5-23.png
    upload_2017-11-19_23-5-23.png
    1,018 bytes · Views: 492
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-6-41.png
    upload_2017-11-19_23-6-41.png
    660 bytes · Views: 475
  • upload_2017-11-19_23-7-31.png
    upload_2017-11-19_23-7-31.png
    553 bytes · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
If you adjust the signs: Euler = (+,+,+,+) and Minkowski = (+, - , - , - ) in your notation, why should there be a difference? Not sure about the Maxwell equations, but the other one is just a formula. Both have symmetries and both are four dimensional, so similarities can be expected, which happens quite often in science without any deeper correlations.
 
Edgar53 said:
has the numeric structure of Maxwell’s equations in 4-space
I am with @Vanadium 50 on this. It doesn’t seem to have the same structure to me. One is a scalar equation and the other is a vector equation.
 
Of course, it has much to do:

Leonhard Euler's four-squares identity prefigures quaternion multiplication:
upload_2017-12-4_22-1-12.png

upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png

upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png

upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png

upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png

It is the very reason why quaternions have a multiplicative norm, i.e. the length
of a product of two quaternions equals the product of the lengths of the
quaternions. Multiplication with a unit quaternion performs an isoclinic
double-rotation in 4-dimensional space; multiplication with an arbitrary
quaternion a double-rotation plus a stretching by the length of the quaternion.

Taking the quaternion differential
upload_2017-12-4_22-5-30.png
of the 4-potential A yields directly
the electromagnetic field in both components E and B:
upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png

upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png

upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png

j
upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png

k
upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png

after rearranging the terms in lines 2, 3, and 4:
upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png

i
upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png

j
upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png

k
upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png

The first line identically vanishes under Lorenz gauge
upload_2017-12-4_22-15-55.png
;
The terms:
upload_2017-12-4_22-22-5.png

are the components of the electric field (under inversion of sign, due to
the Minkowski metric (+1,-1,-1,-1));
and the terms:
upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
;
upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
;
upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
are
upload_2017-12-4_22-20-29.png

are the components of the magnetic field.
The result is then:
upload_2017-12-4_22-25-5.png

i.e. the quaternion differential of the 4-potential A yields both,
the source (E) and the curl (B) part of the electromagnetic
field.
Leonhard Euler's four-square identity offers the most direct access to,
and is probably the reason for Electrodynamics!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    594 bytes · Views: 412
  • upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    684 bytes · Views: 413
  • upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    655 bytes · Views: 388
  • upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    upload_2017-12-4_21-55-41.png
    689 bytes · Views: 425
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-1-12.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-1-12.png
    870 bytes · Views: 394
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-5-30.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-5-30.png
    205 bytes · Views: 396
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    674 bytes · Views: 415
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    638 bytes · Views: 412
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    665 bytes · Views: 415
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    914 bytes · Views: 426
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-12-50.png
    640 bytes · Views: 424
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    640 bytes · Views: 377
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    652 bytes · Views: 369
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    635 bytes · Views: 411
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-14-20.png
    668 bytes · Views: 381
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-15-55.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-15-55.png
    451 bytes · Views: 375
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-17-7.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-17-7.png
    996 bytes · Views: 417
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    494 bytes · Views: 374
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    509 bytes · Views: 366
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-18-37.png
    502 bytes · Views: 391
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-20-29.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-20-29.png
    422 bytes · Views: 368
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-22-5.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-22-5.png
    1 KB · Views: 423
  • upload_2017-12-4_22-25-5.png
    upload_2017-12-4_22-25-5.png
    975 bytes · Views: 411
Edgar53 said:
Leonhard Euler's four-squares identity prefigures quaternion multiplication

The four squares identity has squares inside the parentheses on the LHS. The quaternion multiplication equation you wrote down does not. So I don't see how your claim here is justified.