Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by non-traditional students in obtaining letters of recommendation for graduate school applications. Participants explore various strategies and options for securing effective recommendations, given the unique circumstances of non-traditional educational paths.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern about lacking strong relationships with professors due to attending an online school and asks for alternatives for letters of recommendation.
- Another participant suggests that non-academic letter writers, such as work supervisors, may be acceptable depending on the graduate program.
- A suggestion is made to ask a supervisor to write a letter, emphasizing the importance of providing them with detailed information about the applicant's experiences and skills to help frame the letter effectively.
- It is noted that while a supervisor can speak to work ethic and life experience, a letter from someone with graduate school experience may carry more weight with admissions committees.
- The original poster clarifies that the letters are for graduate school applications and mentions their job involves critical thinking, math, and programming.
- Two potential letter writers are identified, both of whom have graduate school experience, and the original poster considers taking graduate courses to strengthen their application.
- A question is raised about whether recommendation letters are typically required for applying under a graduate non-matriculated status.
- The original poster hopes that their statement of purpose and resume will adequately explain their educational journey and lack of strong professor relationships.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants present multiple viewpoints regarding the suitability of different types of recommenders, with some advocating for academic references while others suggest that professional references may suffice. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for non-traditional students in this context.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty about the specific requirements for letters of recommendation for different graduate programs and the implications of non-traditional educational backgrounds on the admissions process.