Lhc particles harmful to humans?

In summary: But most of that energy will just pass right through the human body without interacting, unlike a car. I was told once that standing in the beam when a bunch passes through would feel like a punch in the stomach, but I don't know how accurate that description is.In summary, it is possible to stand in the lhc, it is not harmful to do so, and it would be dangerous to stand next to a collision.
  • #1
nuclear-boy
33
0
hi,


i like a practical approach to everything (as you can see very clearly in this thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=411875) so i will ask this question:

when the lhc is running and colliding particles, if you stood in it, would you see the reaction occurring?, if so what does it look like?

is it possible to stand in the lhc? is it harmful to do so?, if it is harmful, why is it harmful?



thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, I might not be the best too answer the questions since my interest is far more theoretical but since no one has I will give it a shot.

nuclear-boy said:
hi,
when the lhc is running and colliding particles, if you stood in it, would you see the reaction occurring?, if so what does it look like?

Interesting question. Most of the particles created will not be visible to the human eye. But I since photons are created, and I seen no reason to why all of them should be at higher energies than visible light I expect that you might be able to see a colision as a white spark. However, I don't know if there will be enough of these photons..

nuclear-boy said:
hi,
is it possible to stand in the lhc? is it harmful to do so?, if it is harmful, why is it harmful?

It would be possible to stand in the tunnel where the lhc is built and that should not be very harmful even when they are running at full energy and luminosity. To stand in the actual beam would be harmful, as the protons in the beam would crash into your body, sometimes interacting with the protons inside you and thus damage the tissue. If you were to stand next to a collision that would probably be dangerous as well, at least if you stayed there for a long time (many collisions).

Perhaps somebody else can make things more quantitative.

Cheers
 
  • #3
It is a nice exercies to calculate the energy stored in the beam. All what you need is special relativity and some facts about the LHC beam parameters.

I found this page - unfortunately in German: http://www.lhc-facts.ch/index.php?page=strahlenergie

They are saying that the stored energy is 350 MJ which corresponds to the kinetic energy of a car with approx. 1000 mph.
 
  • #4
tom.stoer said:
It is a nice exercies to calculate the energy stored in the beam.
They are saying that the stored energy is 350 MJ which corresponds to the kinetic energy of a car with approx. 1000 mph.

But most of that energy will just pass right through the human body without interacting, unlike a car. I was told once that standing in the beam when a bunch passes through would feel like a punch in the stomach, but I don't know how accurate that description is.
 
  • #6
phyzguy said:
Obviously, if you stood in the beam you would be killed instantly.

That is not true.

The reason for this is that the beam particles will pass through your body without interacting. The impact it has on your body does not depen on the energy of the proton beam, but on the energy that beam deposited in your body.

As an analouge you can take the constant flow of neutrinos that pass through our body in huge numbers every second. But only one or two of them will interact with you during your entire lifetime. Therefore the energy flowing through you does not have any impact.
 
  • #7
kaksmet said:
But most of that energy will just pass right through the human body without interacting, unlike a car. I was told once that standing in the beam when a bunch passes through would feel like a punch in the stomach, but I don't know how accurate that description is.

That depends on the luminosity. One could get a rough estimate based on the total scattering cross section of a proton with H and O in water. But if you look at the damage, I would say that it's rather dangerous (of course the photopraph shows metal, that makes a difference)
 
  • #8
kaksmet said:
That is not true.

The reason for this is that the beam particles will pass through your body without interacting. The impact it has on your body does not depen on the energy of the proton beam, but on the energy that beam deposited in your body.

As an analouge you can take the constant flow of neutrinos that pass through our body in huge numbers every second. But only one or two of them will interact with you during your entire lifetime. Therefore the energy flowing through you does not have any impact.

Neutrinos only interact through the weak interaction, so they have a very small probability of interacting with the atoms in your body. Protons (which is what the LHC beam is made of ) are charged particles and interact strongly with matter. They will quickly deposit a lot of energy in a short distance. Below is a link with some of this information. A 1 GeV proton has a range of about 2cm in your body. The TeV protons in the LHC might make it through your body, but in passing through they will deposit more than enough energy to kill you.

http://www.nucleonica.net/wiki/index.php/Help:Range_%26_Stopping_Power [Broken]

http://www.nucleonica.net/wiki/index.php/Help:Range_%26_Stopping_Power [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
kaksmet said:
But most of that energy will just pass right through the human body without interacting, unlike a car. I was told once that standing in the beam when a bunch passes through would feel like a punch in the stomach, but I don't know how accurate that description is.

Even if we accept your statement that one bunch is like a punch in the stomach as correct, each beam contains 2808 bunches. How about 6000 punches in the stomach in a fraction of a second?
 
  • #10
kaksmet said:
Hi, I might not be the best too answer the questions since my interest is far more theoretical but since no one has I will give it a shot.



Interesting question. Most of the particles created will not be visible to the human eye. But I since photons are created, and I seen no reason to why all of them should be at higher energies than visible light I expect that you might be able to see a colision as a white spark. However, I don't know if there will be enough of these photons..



It would be possible to stand in the tunnel where the lhc is built and that should not be very harmful even when they are running at full energy and luminosity. To stand in the actual beam would be harmful, as the protons in the beam would crash into your body, sometimes interacting with the protons inside you and thus damage the tissue. If you were to stand next to a collision that would probably be dangerous as well, at least if you stayed there for a long time (many collisions).

Perhaps somebody else can make things more quantitative.

Cheers



thanks for your reply! :)
hmmm it doesn't look like someone else will make it more quantitative than you haha,
i have a strange idea that the collisions would produce a purple-blue glow, but i think I've got that idea from seeing this picture:
http://brian-mcdermott.com/20kv.JPG [Broken]

do you think standing in the beam would cause permanent damage?, could it be fatal?, how long would it take to cause permanent damage, and how long would it take to kill the person standing in the beam?


did you that you could achieve nuclear fusion easily for a few thousand dollars?
well you can! : http://brian-mcdermott.com/


thanks again for your help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
phyzguy said:
A 1 GeV proton has a range of about 2cm in your body. The TeV protons in the LHC might make it through your body, but in passing through they will deposit more than enough energy to kill you.

I would like to know where you get the 2cm for a 1GeV proton from? Can you give me a reference?
From what I understand, the range should increase with increase energy, and "The range of a 125 MeV proton in tissue is 12 cm., while that of a 200 MeV proton is 27 cm."
According to http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~wilson/cyclotron/Bob_Wilson_Radiology.html

Also the energy deposit decreases with increasing energy, which means that a TeV proton will deposit very little of its energy.

The remark about the large number of bunches is true, and if the punch in the stomach analogue really works, well.. it does not take much imagination to know what would happen then.

Perhaps someone with more info know something like the mean free path of a proton in water, at TeV energies.
 
  • #13
When the beam is running collisions with any remaining air molecules in the beam line and beam wandering that causes protons to hit the walls also generates radiation.

So the tunnel is a no-go area when powered up and for a short while after.
 
  • #14
kaksmet said:
I would like to know where you get the 2cm for a 1GeV proton from? Can you give me a reference?
From what I understand, the range should increase with increase energy, and "The range of a 125 MeV proton in tissue is 12 cm., while that of a 200 MeV proton is 27 cm."
According to http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~wilson/cyclotron/Bob_Wilson_Radiology.html

Also the energy deposit decreases with increasing energy, which means that a TeV proton will deposit very little of its energy.

The remark about the large number of bunches is true, and if the punch in the stomach analogue really works, well.. it does not take much imagination to know what would happen then.

Perhaps someone with more info know something like the mean free path of a proton in water, at TeV energies.

I think you're right that it is not as bad as I said, but it still looks like enough to kill you. I made an exponent mistake before - the range of a 1GeV proton in water is about 200cm (158cm, according to the reference below), not 2 cm as I said before. Let's try and do it more carefully. I found an excellent reference from NIST on range and stopping power of protons:

http://www.physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star/ap_table.pl

This only goes up to 10 GeV, but notice that at 10 GeV we are out of the regime where dE/dx ~ 1/E. I think this is because of the Fermi correction to the Bethe formula, where the protons have become relativistic enough that they are seeing a higher density of matter due to relativistic length contraction. So let's calculate how much energy the beam would deposit at 10GeV. This is as high as the NIST tables go, and you can see that the energy deposition rate is starting to increase at the end of the graph, so this appears to be a conservative assumption. At 10 GeV, dE/dx = 4.5 MeV-cm^2/g, which, since the density of water is 1.0 g/cm^3, gives 4.5 MeV/cm. Assuming your body is about 20 cm thick, this means each proton deposits about 90 MeV of energy. The LHC has ~ 3E14 protons in the beam, so the total energy deposited is ~ 9E7eV x 3E14 x 1.6E-19 ~ 3000J. So, not like getting hit with a car, or even a 10,000J rifle bullet, but I still think it would kill you. Looking at the picture of the metal plate that tom.stoer uploaded, I'm sure not going to stand in the beam!
 
  • #15
Isn't the LHC beam in a vacuum?
 
  • #16
nuclear-boy said:
hi,


i like a practical approach to everything (as you can see very clearly in this thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=411875) so i will ask this question:

when the lhc is running and colliding particles, if you stood in it, would you see the reaction occurring?, if so what does it look like?

is it possible to stand in the lhc? is it harmful to do so?, if it is harmful, why is it harmful?

thanks for your time

You wouldn't see anything, but in the collider chamber (if you could fit yourself inside), you would be subject to a lot a radiation and would likely die.

In the beamline itself, you would be subject to radiation damage as well. Google "proton therapy" to see how the mechanism works. It's not like getting punched, at all. The deposited energy depends on the energy of the proton.
 
  • #17
Andy Resnick said:
You wouldn't see anything, but in the collider chamber (if you could fit yourself inside), you would be subject to a lot a radiation and would likely die.

In the beamline itself, you would be subject to radiation damage as well. Google "proton therapy" to see how the mechanism works. It's not like getting punched, at all. The deposited energy depends on the energy of the proton.




thanks for your help, i appreciate it xx :)
 
  • #18
thanks for all of your replys, you were very helpful, i really appreciate it :) xx
 
  • #19
The beam indeed does circulate in a vacuum. This means you would need some sort of breathing apparatus. Also, the entire beamline is cooled to something like 70 K (~-200 C), so you would rapidly freeze to death if you were in contact with anything.

Additionally, your body heat might result in nearby superconducting magnets quenching, which I've heard is a very violent process, though I'm not sure how.
 
  • #20
thanks for all of your help, i greatly appreciate it :)
 

1. Are Lhc particles harmful to humans?

No, Lhc particles are not harmful to humans. The Large Hadron Collider (Lhc) is designed to safely accelerate and collide particles, and the resulting energy levels are much lower than those found in nature.

2. Can Lhc particles cause cancer or radiation sickness?

No, Lhc particles do not have enough energy to cause cancer or radiation sickness. The particles produced by the Lhc are similar to those found in nature and are not harmful to humans.

3. Is there a risk of black holes being created by the Lhc?

No, the energy levels produced by the Lhc are not high enough to create black holes. Even if black holes were created, they would be extremely small and would evaporate almost immediately.

4. How does the Lhc ensure the safety of its experiments?

The Lhc has a variety of safety measures in place, including multiple layers of radiation shielding, emergency shutdown systems, and extensive safety reviews by experts. The safety of the experiments is constantly monitored and evaluated.

5. Have there been any reported negative effects from the Lhc?

No, there have been no reported negative effects from the Lhc. The safety of the Lhc and its experiments has been extensively studied and reviewed by experts, and there is no evidence to suggest that it poses any danger to humans.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
811
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top