B Library of Babel quantum state

Juanchotutata
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello!

If the Library of Babel has 10^(2,000,000) books, does anyone think that it is possible to create a quantum state (with a quantum computer) that represents this Library? I think that in a classical way it is impossible, but in a quantum way?

I find it quite interesting! What about you? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could convert everything to binary, then convert the binary to a number between zero and one, and then mark a stick at that length. Problem solved.
 
  • Like
Likes tnich
Vanadium 50 said:
You could convert everything to binary, then convert the binary to a number between zero and one, and then mark a stick at that length. Problem solved.
Or you could just build a tower that high.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You could convert everything to binary, then convert the binary to a number between zero and one, and then mark a stick at that length. Problem solved.
I was thinking about calculating the number of bits which would correspond to 10^(2,000,000) books and see if it is possible to represent it with a quantum computer.
 
Juanchotutata said:
I was thinking about calculating the number of bits which would correspond to 10^(2,000,000) books and see if it is possible to represent it with a quantum computer.
Quantum computers are not well-suited to storing information. It takes as many qubits to store your library of Babel as non-quantum bits. Another serious drawback to the idea is that qubits don't stay coherent very long, and the information you stored would only be retrievable for a very short time even with best current technology. You could improve the retention time with quantum error correction, which would require even more qubits. I think you are expecting that quantum entanglement would allow you to store and retrieve a lot of information with a small number of qubits. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. The number of bits of information a quantum computer can output is limited to the number of its component qubits. So even if you could store 2n bits of information in n qubits, you would only be able to get n bits back out, leaving you with a sort of write-only memory.
 
  • Like
Likes Mentz114
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top