Lifting a canister with a pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter problem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifting Pulley
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force required to lift a 25 kg canister using a pulley system. The correct force, F, is derived from the equation F = mg/d, where m is the mass (25 kg) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²). The user initially miscalculated the force by not considering the 2:1 mechanical advantage provided by the pulley system, which means the force exerted should be halved to maintain a constant speed while lifting the canister.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of pulley systems and mechanical advantage
  • Familiarity with the concepts of force, mass, and acceleration
  • Ability to perform calculations involving gravitational force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mechanical advantage in pulley systems
  • Learn how to apply Newton's second law in practical scenarios
  • Explore different types of pulley configurations and their effects on force calculations
  • Practice problems involving force calculations with varying mass and distance
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineering students, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of lifting systems and force calculations.

problem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the figure, a cord runs around two massless, frictionless pulleys; a canister with mass m = 25 kg hangs from one pulley; and you exert a force F on the free end of the cord. What must be the magnitude of F if you are to lift the canister at a constant speed?

Here i know that the answer is mg*d. So 25*9.81*0.066m but i am not getting the answer. as i have in the book. in the previous question was To lift the canister by 3.3 cm i had to lift it by 6.6 cm so i don't what i am doing that i s wrong. Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no figure associated with your post, but from the last thing you said, it sounds like the pulley arrangement gives you a 2:1 force advantage. Did you take that into account in your calculation for the first question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K