Light building the standard model

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the nature of light, questioning why it is considered massless despite having momentum and being affected by gravity. Participants argue that light's momentum and gravitational influence suggest it should have mass, while others clarify that light's behavior aligns with quantum mechanics, which does not require mass. The concept of relativistic mass is debated, with some asserting that photons have no rest mass but can exhibit energy-related properties. The conversation highlights the complexities of classical mechanics versus quantum physics in understanding light's characteristics. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the notion that light is massless, supported by extensive experimental evidence.
  • #61
How do we know light has its own gravitational field? This certainly was never mentioned in my physics classes so far... and I've not seen any mention of it with electromagnetic waves... Where can I find information on this?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #62
Well relativity says that mass energy or pressure bends space-time and light has energy.
If a positron and an electron collide they produce a photon or 2, I am not sure if its 1 or 2, but the electron and positron have mass and I am sure you would agree they have a Gravitational field. So if energy is conserved why would the gravitational field go away. It would seem weird. Even tho the Electric and magnetic field go away. But its something think about. Google gravitational field of light.
 
  • #63
elegysix said:
How do we know light has its own gravitational field? This certainly was never mentioned in my physics classes so far... and I've not seen any mention of it with electromagnetic waves... Where can I find information on this?
It is called a pp-wave spacetime:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pp-wave_spacetime
 
  • #64
elegysix said:
This is a major part of what I am questioning. From classical mechanics alone, I see no reason to believe this. We know classical mechanics works. So starting with classical mechanics, How do you figure that these things happen?
Because, in some extreme cases, classical mechanics doesn't work. Specifically, the Michaelson-Morely experiment gives results different from classical mechanics and so do experiments in the photo-electric effect.
 
  • #65
So light has its own gravitational field... even more reason for me to think it has mass. Lol.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know what the calculated mass from its gravitational field would be? Is this the same as the mass calculated from radiation pressure?

I know that your immediate response is that this is pointless to do, but humor me please lol
 
  • #66
Are you asking what rest mass a particle would have that had an equal G field to a photon. I think they call it Gravitational effective mass. I am sure you could do it with E=mc^2. If light had mass it seems like it would pulverize other things because it is traveling so fast could you imagine the kinetic energy. When we collide protons together in accelerators after the collision we can have the sum of the rest masses of the particles greater than the 2 protons, we are turning kinetic energy into mass. Thats why we build bigger accelerators to find more massive particles. If you think light having its own G field is weird, you could ask does the G-field itself have its own field or does an E or B field have a Gravitational field. Are gravitational waves affected by gravity.
 
  • #67
Anyone know the most important experiments done with light? I want to review them.
 
  • #68
elegysix said:
Anyone know the most important experiments done with light? I want to review them.

Well, a few that spring to mind:

Relativity theory:
Michelson-Morley experiment
Deflection of light by the Sun
Gravitational redshift

Quantum theory:
Young's double-slit experiment
Photoelectric effect
Compton effect
 
  • #69
elegysix said:
So light has its own gravitational field... even more reason for me to think it has mass. Lol.
Did you miss the entire thread?

elegysix said:
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know what the calculated mass from its gravitational field would be? Is this the same as the mass calculated from radiation pressure?

I know that your immediate response is that this is pointless to do, but humor me please lol
It is not pointless, but it is not easy to do either, and it depends very strongly on the exact setup. See the link I posted earlier and google "pp-wave spacetime". You will get several examples, but the math is somewhat intense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K