- #36
threadmark
- 121
- 0
If you are referring to the quadradic mean then yes that’s a formulation, but if your referring to quantum mechanics then no its not a formulation it’s a principle.
threadmark said:If you are referring to the quadradic mean then yes that’s a formulation, but if your referring to quantum mechanics then no its not a formulation it’s a principle.
threadmark said:The fact is, Niels Bohr gave us the description of the complimentary. being you need wave and particle functions to describe light. Look it up, its fact. you can also look up Luis de Broglie how stated
E=hv ; p=hv/c
On the left is the equation belonging to particles. And on the right are properties relating frequency/waves. even to measure the particle property of momentum you need to know the wave property called frequency
threadmark said:His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta (Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves. This included the wave-particle duality theory of matter, based on the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate.
threadmark said:His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta (Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves. This included the wave-particle duality theory of matter, based on the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate.
Yeah. Threadmark: technically, that's plagiarism. Use the quotes feature.Born2bwire said:And really, if you are going to post word for word other people's work, you should cite where you took the passage from, in this case Wikipedia.
threadmark said:I think we need to stick to the facts,( Light can't travel at the speed of light?)
Well to answer this question, we need to ask what is light and what is it traveling in. empty space? , glass? Its 299,792,458m/s if E=mc^2. if light can't travel at the speed of light then tell us where Einstein got his formula wrong.
threadmark said:Hey dude, I refer to the original question of this post. i study the history of physics, from Newtonian physics/classical physics and quanta. My books may be old but they still are relative today. It confused me when you stated it acts like a particle. So I post my books information to get feedback but you still say I am wrong. I came at you like I did because the information I have known for years had been protested by zapperz. I have taught this history to people.
threadmark said:Hey dude, I refer to the original question of this post. i study the history of physics, from Newtonian physics/classical physics and quanta. My books may be old but they still are relative today. It confused me when you stated it acts like a particle. So I post my books information to get feedback but you still say I am wrong. I came at you like I did because the information I have known for years had been protested by zapperz. I have taught this history to people.