Can Two Airships Achieve Superluminal Speed with Elastic Material?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Strategiest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Superluminal
Strategiest
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If we have two airships going at speed 0.6c in the opposite directions. then they will be separated at a speed higher than light.

let's name the airships , A and B
My question is , Let's say we have the two airships pull an elastic material.
take a point of the material on Airship A name it a , and a point on airship B. name it b. if they go at a speed close to light , then point a and b will be going at a speed faster than light ?

If so. then shouldn't all the points on the elastic material be going at a speed faster than light ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't add relativistic speeds in the same way you do with everyday speeds.

V = \frac{v+u}{1+\frac{uv}{c^{2}}}

Let v = 0.6c and u = 0.6c, that gives V = 0.88c, so they aren't moving apart at a speed greater than light, but less than light.
 
Besides...
Strategiest said:
If we have two airships going at speed 0.6c in the opposite directions. then they will be separated at a speed higher than light.

let's name the airships , A and B
My question is , Let's say we have the two airships pull an elastic material.
take a point of the material on Airship A name it a , and a point on airship B. name it b. if they go at a speed close to light , then point a and b will be going at a speed faster than light ?
If the spacecraft are going .6C, then quite obviously, the fastest any part of the material will be going is .6C - right where it is connected to a spacecraft .

And...
If so. then shouldn't all the points on the elastic material be going at a speed faster than light ?
Also quite obviously, a point at the center of an elastic band is stationary wrt where the stretching started. Try it with a broken rubber band - put a mark at the center and pull the ends apart. The mark doesn't ever move.
 
Thank you.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top