I LIGO: Detecting Differences Less Than a Proton Length - How is It Possible?

AI Thread Summary
The LIGO detector achieves remarkable sensitivity by measuring relative changes in the lengths of its perpendicular arms, rather than absolute positions, which simplifies the detection of gravitational waves. It employs highly precise mirror mounts, operates in a vacuum, and uses stable lasers to minimize environmental interference. Extensive post-processing of signals helps correct for vibrations and noise, allowing it to detect changes smaller than the length of a proton. The system is designed to maintain alignment near the dark fringe of interference patterns, enhancing sensitivity to minute changes. Overall, LIGO's design and technology enable it to detect gravitational waves from cosmic events like merging neutron stars and black holes.
thegroundhog
Messages
16
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
How is the LIGO detector able to be so accurate?
I read that the LIGO detector in the US was able to detect a difference of less that the length of a proton, or maybe even less than this. How is this possible? The perpendicular arms won't be the same length down to the nearest proton length. Also, at such small lengths the microclimate on each arm might be enough to shift the apparatus 1000x more than a proton length. What about minor tremors and other meteorological phenomena? I would love to know the exact detail of how it is able to be so accurate.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this video. Veritasium answers your question with a very good explanation.

 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and thegroundhog
Well, it took them many years to get to that level of sensitivity so it is presumably not easy...
The LIGO collaboration has published a large number of technical papers describing their setups (I have read some of them since I've used some related signal processing techniques). There are also a large number of popular articles. Have a look at the LIGO website.

Anyway, one of the key points here is they are detecting a difference between two signals/path. This is much, much easier than e.g. measuring the absolute position of two objects. That is, you don';t need to know WHERE the protons are in order to detect a relative change in position.
 
  • Like
Likes thegroundhog
Very precise mirror mounts that are extremely well isolated from their surroundings, mounted in extremely high vacuum, illuminated with extremely stable lasers, and surrounded by lots of sensors to detect uncontrolled vibration, and with extensive post processing of the signals to correct for that, is my understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes thegroundhog and Motore
LIGO and Virgo look for gravitational waves in the range of ~50-1000 Hz, optimal for merging neutron stars and stellar mass black holes. Motion that has a much lower frequency is not disturbing the measurement unless it's excessive. A multi-step pendulum suspension dampens motion in the sensitive range. They keep the interference near the dark fringe because that leads to larger relative changes in brightness from small changes in length difference. Sometimes noise is so large that they lose that alignment, during that time that individual detector cannot take data.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Ibix
So basically, the change of interferometer arm length by a tiny fraction of laser wavelength transforms into a tiny fraction of laser light power compared to laser source power. By taking the source power big enough, even this tiny fraction of power becomes detectable.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top