Likelihood of light being absorbed/re-emitted in 50 light years

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the likelihood of light being absorbed and re-emitted by interstellar gas and the heliosphere, and how this affects the light that reaches observers on Earth. Participants explore the implications of absorption and re-emission on different wavelengths of light, particularly focusing on high-energy x-rays and their interaction with various media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the likelihood of light being absorbed and re-emitted by interstellar gas, questioning how much of the light we see is affected by this process.
  • One participant references a paper suggesting that high-energy x-rays are less likely to be disturbed, prompting questions about their ability to pass through the heliosphere unaffected.
  • There is a discussion about the randomness of light direction upon re-emission after absorption.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the absorption of hard x-rays by the Earth's atmosphere, questioning the applicability of the findings from the referenced paper to the heliosphere.
  • Another participant notes that absorption bands can be observed in the spectra of distant objects, indicating that not all light is absorbed, which varies by wavelength.
  • A viewpoint is presented that considers light propagation as a process where vacuum can absorb and re-emit light without making it "second hand," suggesting that the index of refraction is the primary change.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effects of absorption and re-emission on light, particularly concerning different wavelengths and the role of the heliosphere. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the likelihood of light being filtered in this manner.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about the behavior of light in different media, the dependence on specific definitions of absorption and re-emission, and the unresolved implications of the referenced paper on the heliosphere's effects.

epicurean
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What's the likelihood of light striking some interstellar gas and being absorbed, then re-emitted, and the re-emitted light actually being the light we see rather than the original light from the source? Also, what about the likelihood of reemission after passing through the heliosphere? Anyone care to make a rough guess at the percentage of light that reaches us that is not filtered this way? Are there any particular wavelengths of light that might be more likely to make it through because they aren't likely to be absorbed by the interstellar medium or the heliosphere?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hmm, apparently this paper http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/Brecher-K-1977.pdf answers that question. It says high energy x-rays are less likely to be disturbed... any thoughts? Would high energy x-rays be able to pass through the heliosphere unaffected?
 
When light is absorbed and then re-emitted it is so in random directions isn't it?
 
Apparently hard x rays are absorbed rather well by the Earth's atmosphere, so I'm not sure why the 1977 paper does not think the heliosphere would have a similar effect. Can someone help clarify?
 
epicurean said:
What's the likelihood of light striking some interstellar gas and being absorbed, then re-emitted, and the re-emitted light actually being the light we see rather than the original light from the source? Also, what about the likelihood of reemission after passing through the heliosphere? Anyone care to make a rough guess at the percentage of light that reaches us that is not filtered this way? Are there any particular wavelengths of light that might be more likely to make it through because they aren't likely to be absorbed by the interstellar medium or the heliosphere?

Pretty likely, we can see the adsorption bands in spectorgraphs of distant objects. Since such adsorpton is usually wavelength depentent not all of the light is adsorbed. That which does leaves dark bands in the spectrum.
 
You can think of light propagation as vacuum absorbing and re-emitting it. If something else gets in the way and does the same thing, all it's going to change is index of refraction. The light isn't any more "second hand" because of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K