Limit for a two variables function Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the limit of two-variable functions as they approach (0,0). The user presents their work on the first function and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their process and the next steps. A recommendation is made to convert the functions to polar coordinates to assess the limit's existence, emphasizing that if the limit depends on the angle θ, it does not exist. This method provides a definitive approach to determining limits in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates
  • Knowledge of multivariable functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates in calculus
  • Study the definition of limits for multivariable functions
  • Explore examples of limits that depend on the path taken
  • Practice calculating limits using polar coordinates with various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable functions and limits, as well as anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of limit calculations in higher mathematics.

Freydulf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have some doubts bound up with an exercise of limits. It demands to calculate the existence of the limit in (0,0) of these two functions.

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/bd1b868f7e07af600ea0c82b34a38137.png

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/5a3966109b20a098800453a99467592c.png

My solution for the first one til now is:

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/667c03805a5b4b203406f69cf574c56e.png

Well, after the substitution we have http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/04dd2173792059a5b0e5447b852baf28.png

So we can use http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/722e499f2e8ad1b9b66060f151689378.png

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/2bde7e5f3e31f640f734b26dcf229dc4.png

Using http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/03d4bbee51cd042a5e43f4b8eed0e81e.png

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/a4abe4b98d7e1c4782faca7c9db897f9.png

And http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/597c072a27536c4904c39673dc916ace.png

http://www.rinconmatematico.com/latexrender/pictures/b04c33391868c0ff16d9fa2933c6466b.png

Well, I don't know if I've done correctly all the process, but if I did, I guess that in the next step I have to calculate the limit by the definition to conclude the exercise, and that's one of the things that I don't know how to do.
The second exercise is similar to the first one but I don't know how to do it either. Maybe the minus changes the result and there's not limit and any necessity of employing the definition.
Anyhow, can someone lend me a hand? :)

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For problems like this, after you have tried taking the limit along different paths and seen that you don't get different answer (which would have proved the limit does not exist), I recommend converting to polar coordinates. That way "closeness" to (0,0) is measured only by r, not the angle [/itex]\theta[/itex]. If the limit, as r goes to 0, is a constant, not depending on \theta that is the limit of the function. If the limit as r goes to 0 depends on \theta, the limit does not exist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K